What is Your View on String Theory?

[darkmatter42]

String theory - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › String_theory

 

 

[Vmedvil2]

11 hours ago, darkmatter42 said:

 

String theory - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › String_theory

 

 

My view on String Theory is it is the future of physics, someday when we probe the Planck length with instruments it will be proven correct.

[Vmedvil2]

On 8/18/2021 at 11:18 AM, darkmatter42 said:

 

String theory - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › String_theory

 

 

For your viewing I have posted a thread about String Theory and M-Theory.

link = https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/38471-string-theory-and-m-theory-lectures-from-stanford-university/

 

[Dubbelosix]

I think sometimes particles act like strings, but it doesn't mean de facto that they are.

[phillip1882]

i don't really understand it, so i can't really comment.

 

[darkmatter42]

On 8/19/2021 at 5:58 PM, VictorMedvil said:

For your viewing I have posted a thread about String Theory and M-Theory.

link = https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/38471-string-theory-and-m-theory-lectures-from-stanford-university/

 

Yes, it is the future of physics. If it can be proved, that opens a whole lot of possibilities.

[OceanBreeze]

On 8/22/2021 at 2:05 AM, phillip1882 said:

i don't really understand it, so i can't really comment.

 

If everyone held that philosophy, nobody would ever post anything!

[OceanBreeze]

4 hours ago, darkmatter42 said:

Yes, it is the future of physics. If it can be proved, that opens a whole lot of possibilities.

Some physicists think the problem with string theory is that it opens up too many possibilities to be useful.

[Dubbelosix]

18 hours ago, OceanBreeze said:

Some physicists think the problem with string theory is that it opens up too many possibilities to be useful.

Well this is why they call it theory of everything, because its landscape of possibilities, said to be 10^500 and at least one of them has theoretical basis of being true. Some have gone as far to say all possibilities arise, but I've always been skeptical of parallel universes, or many world theory.

[darkmatter42]

1 hour ago, Dubbelosix said:

Well this is why they call it theory of everything, because its landscape of possibilities, said to be 10^500 and at least one of them has theoretical basis of being true. Some have gone as far to say all possibilities arise, but I've always been skeptical of parallel universes, or many world theory.

How are you skeptical?

[Dubbelosix]

1 hour ago, darkmatter42 said:

How are you skeptical?

Until we can find a unified theory of one universe, that would suffice. To think of an array of infinite universes that are strictly unobservable, falls into Popper falsifiability, in the same realm of string theory thus far, and can no longer be held to scientific rigor of a true theory.

Edited August 24, 2021 by Dubbelosix

[phillip1882]

I'm fairly confident in the many world theory, I've met people from other worlds.

 

 

[darkmatter42]

The Multiverse theory is pretty much impossible to test, however, a lot of my favourite theories are as well. 

[Vmedvil2]

7 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

My work modifies "many worlds" into "replaced worlds"

My Work Modifies a "Blunt Wrap" into "Blunt Man".

[Vmedvil2]

1 hour ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

 

Don't make me have to send the Kitsune Army after you, they will claw and bite you to death.

Edited August 25, 2021 by VictorMedvil

[Vmedvil2]

4 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

Don't make me have to send the Kitsune Army after you, they will claw and bite you to death.

 

[darkmatter42]

This just got a little bit weird.... No complaints, though!