Werewolves609 Posted January 9, 2022 Report Share Posted January 9, 2022 With the understanding of linear equations in a continuous quadratic formula and the understanding of the speed of light and how heredity defines eye color and geometric shapes. One could grasp the understanding of traveling back in time. Considering sir Isaac Newton hasn't been proven, wrong. Autodidactocrat 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Autodidactocrat Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 17 hours ago, Werewolves609 said: With the understanding of linear equations in a continuous quadratic formula and the understanding of the speed of light and how heredity defines eye color and geometric shapes. One could grasp the understanding of traveling back in time. Considering sir Isaac Newton hasn't been proven, wrong. ARTSY FARTSY 🤬🤮🔁🙏🎯😎🦆😋 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Autodidactocrat Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Mathsty smarshty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Nobel prize ryan dutton. Relativity; 60 miles per hour, is 5400ft a minute. Which, mean the faster you travel the further you travel and not only that. But, the further and faster means lose of e=mc^2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 in terms of speed of light iis relative according to albert eistien unless, thosee only understanding bold print can say they have proved him worng on basic equations. Which I highly doubt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 screenshot convo windows key and prntscreen sysrq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Radicals solve exponential growth? Correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Proof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, Werewolves609 said: Proof. 3 minutes ago, Werewolves609 said: Proof. 12 hours ago, Autodidactocrat said: Mathsty smarshty 12 hours ago, Autodidactocrat said: ARTSY FARTSY 🤬🤮🔁🙏🎯😎🦆😋 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 2 hours ago, Werewolves609 said: Nobel prize ryan dutton. Relativity; 60 miles per hour, is 5400ft a minute. Which, mean the faster you travel the further you travel and not only that. But, the further and faster means lose of e=mc^2. Do not lose all means of friction definetley not light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Mass added probably equals c without it's percentage calculated by volume at less than or equal too, (>) + (_). . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werewolves609 Posted January 10, 2022 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Just now, Werewolves609 said: Mass added probably equals c without it's percentage calculated by volume at less than or equal too, (>) + (_). . 13 hours ago, Autodidactocrat said: Mathsty smarshty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArthurSmith Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 On 1/9/2022 at 9:00 AM, Werewolves609 said: With the understanding of linear equations in a continuous quadratic formula and the understanding of the speed of light and how heredity defines eye color and geometric shapes. One could grasp the understanding of traveling back in time. Considering sir Isaac Newton hasn't been proven, wrong. I'm curious about the connection between quadratic equations, the speed of light and how eye colour inheritance works. And, for that matter, where Newton comes in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArthurSmith Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 56 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said: You should be more curios about the connection between the wavelengths of light within the visible spectrum and the width betweenst pupils. Should I? Why so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArthurSmith Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Just now, JeffreysTubes8 said: Because all emotions positive and negative are derived from two organic minds causing cell-division & change/aging inherent in every organism. That's why the more coordinated you get from painful exercise and muscle confusion related rep failure the smarter you get and the better your vision gets in blissful flowstates ya dunst That makes no sense, Jeffrey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArthurSmith Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 Jeffrey, I'm going to leave you to have this conversation by yourself. I don't think you need my input. Stay safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vmedvil2 Posted January 10, 2022 Report Share Posted January 10, 2022 17 minutes ago, ArthurSmith said: That makes no sense, Jeffrey. Ya, Jeffrey makes sense about 10% of the time, it's just something you will have to deal with on this forums. Some think he is crazy and others that he is just a troll but we are uncertain so we just leave him alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.