Nonsense posts from the Galilean Relativity thread

[Autodidactocrat]

No there is not. Different graviton velocities have different propagation rates of g waves equal to the frame-drag rate of the g field they produce. Every subatomic particle is the sum of planck-sized graviton collisions. Although we can't see these preonic gravitons.

Edited January 20, 2022 by Autodidactocrat

[Autodidactocrat]

46 minutes ago, Autodidactocrat said:

No there is not. Different graviton velocities have different propagation rates of g waves equal to the frame-drag rate of the g field they produce. Every subatomic particle is the sum of planck-sized graviton collisions. Although we can't see these preonic gravitons.

Proof:

https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-tunnel-shows-particles-can-break-the-speed-of-light-20201020/

It is likely that when two or more gravitons share the same center they will produce a g-waves slower than the speed of light however any other gravitons caught within a Planck length to a supergraviton interacting with them will be tugged out of that g-wave's influence. Hence, tachyon radiation observed clearly in quantum tunnelling experiments, which shouldn't be possible under the dictates of static relativity. 

[Autodidactocrat]

4 hours ago, EfisCompMon said:

 What is this a function of exactly, moving relative to the Earth's gravitational field? 

All you need for the precession of Mercury is Newtonian mechanics, the wind jet in rotors of air turbines and various jet turbines are a little more obvious than that - and so for the sake of my addition to motion being as infinitesimally asimilar and dynamic about the universe as is the rate of time I will just answer the quoted question. The answer isn't a simple yes, more specifically than 'yes' is that even the Earth's gravitational field is made of infinitesimal variations of frame-dragging rates acting to the ticks of many clocks on a mass. So we have gravitational tugs per time, aka frame-drag rates, for liquids, solids, gases (yes that includes wind where the 'it' regarding gravity's relation to relativity is a function of the speed of sound), plasmas, and electricity and even photons and dark energy. 

Most of the effects of the gravitational waves radiating from the collision of black holes in the ligo detection of g-waves are so much greater in magnitude than the photons the event reflects, not because they got to that point in space as quickly, but because they got there much more slowly (and thus have a much smaller field radius than the g-waves moving at c that are acting upon that same proximity).

Due to the inverse square law it's the slower GWs whose fields exhibit the most strength, even if they arise from more time-dilated sources than light where the gravitons of photons or 'standard c velocity of the gravity waves of the vacuum' get trapped and are caught in a tug of war without escaping that vortex as reflected light does, slowed graviton collisions will produce slower g-waves. 

More evidence than the quantum tunnelling experiment or inconsistencies between the two atomic clock experiments in the Kate 70s: Ligo observed the collision a fraction of a moment before the lasers measured a reduction in local space. 

The only exception to this is dark energy. If we think of black holes not as objects collapsing beneath the planck volume but instead dark stars whose Planck cores are just many gravitons occupying the same volume, or super gravitons circling around each other at relativistic velocities, wherein the g-waves in this system are nigh-c the frame-dragging will propel any gravitons in their vicinity outside of the g-waves propagating from that source ftl...which is why we can't see inside the eh where the field strength propels any energy reaching us from inside of that vicinity where the gravity still yanks stuff ftl. It's a spectrum of radiation instruments in our rate of time cannot detect, dark energy phases right through the laser-based sensors.

All matter and energy are made of gravitons creating and modifying the gravitational interactions that are in turn orchestrating their collective motion. Mathematical objects representing the pi-curve in 3 dimensions, spheres of a Planck volume that move through a fourth dimension. When two of them occupy some of the same space, mathematically their collective volumes are squared without there actually being any real numbers (or integers) to define said volumes.

So instead, space (non-integer metric units) itself has to be reduced by the square root of it's volume (in other words, 'by it's diameter') where the volumes of the two spheres are overlapping, and this reduction in space alone gets carried at the same rate at which the gravitons are traveling through space, and each time it does it's magnitude (intensity of frame-dragging) is square-rooted (hence the inverse square law).

Ergo, gravity is projected by real bodies in the 3rd dimension interacting through velocity via ratio'd units of space over time. It's Murphy's law, gravity is the highest expression of causality that the one and only natural geometric series can yield. The lowest being a point of zero dimensions. So gravity must happen, according Murphy's law, even in a purely mathematical sense of the law.

At the heart of the physics entailed by the geometric series leading to gravitons and gravity is the Planck volume, which is derived from the Planck length, which is a matter of observation expressed and calculated by the formula (grav constant times plancks reduced constant over c cubed) and the Planck time (grav constant times plancks reduced constant over c⁵).

If you want to go down the incalculable path of finding the exact precession of mercury (and there are no exacts that can be calculated in nature and not just because of the uncertainty principle but because of the calculations you need) I'd start with finding out those 216 coordinates I allude to in this thread where I teach myself vector calculus. 

Edited January 21, 2022 by Autodidactocrat

[Autodidactocrat]

I'll tell you the 216 coordinate base matrix of that p-adic series of matrices itself encompasses 3 vectors, run the base through the power tower and each vector in that series are cubic vectors. The gravity created by that vector series expressed in it's 4D footprint would be perfect for calculating Lagrange points in our solar system.

Lagrange points don't just exist between the sun and the moon and the earth, they also occur a little during fission and fusion and a lot during annihilation, points where the g-waves with the largest field radiuses snatch the gravitons of matter particles and accelerate them to the speed of light. Non-negative mass Alcubierre warp bubbles, for instance, are Lagrange points betweenst negative ions whose field strengths cancel out the frame-drag rates of those g-waves from the same source with larger field radiuses that travel at c.

Edited January 21, 2022 by Autodidactocrat

[Autodidactocrat]

Off-top, you say? Kehk, one could argue OP bringing up something the Wright Brothers started has nothing to do with Einstein's modifications to Newtonian Mechanics, all of which have little to do with Galileo's mapping of our star system and the trajectories of all it's earthly bodies observable by telescope. Relativity does not speak on Astronomy, astronomy and astrophysics are as off-topic as supergravity.

[Autodidactocrat]

4 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

Alas & consequently so, for as long as the situation in which we find ourselves continues to remain static, I will never be able to truly appreciate what the best version of me had achieved in virtuoso; and thus - we'll never be able to actualize our dream.

[OceanBreeze]

Moderator Note: This thread is created to hold all the nonsense posts removed from the Galilean Relativity thread.