Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had a look through it and I don't see the point of it and it looks like they are trying to sell a book. I couldn't think of any other reason for the effort to propose something to replace trigonometry, trying to claim it's easier for students and quicker to use. There's nothing wrong with trig.

 

Bordering on spam? It's a strange claim too.

Posted

This statement from the first chapter of the book really clarified for me just how ignorant this man is, "To build up mathematics properly, axioms are not necessary." I'm amazed that the University of South Wales is promoting this work. This will make their math department the laughing stock of mathematics academia.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...