Hubble Finds Mysterious Disk of Blue Stars Around Black Hole

[C1ay]

Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have identified the source of a mysterious blue light surrounding a supermassive black hole in our neighboring Andromeda Galaxy (M31). Though the light has puzzled astronomers for more than a decade, the new discovery makes the story even more mysterious.

 

lefthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/andromeda_thumb.jpg[/img]The blue light is coming from a disk of hot, young stars. These stars are whipping around the black hole in much the same way as planets in our solar system are revolving around the Sun. Astronomers are perplexed about how the pancake-shaped disk of stars could form so close to a giant black hole. In such a hostile environment, the black hole's tidal forces should tear matter apart, making it difficult for gas and dust to collapse and form stars. The observations, astronomers say, may provide clues to the activities in the cores of more distant galaxies.

 

By finding the disk of stars, astronomers also have collected what they say is ironclad evidence for the existence of the monster black hole. The evidence has helped astronomers rule out all alternative theories for the dark mass in Andromeda's core, which scientists have long suspected was a black hole.

 

"Seeing these stars is like watching a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat. You know it happened but you don't know how it happened," said Tod Lauer of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory in Tucson, Arizona. He and a team of astronomers, led by Ralf Bender of the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany, and John Kormendy of the University of Texas in Austin, made the Hubble observations. The team's results will be published in the Sept. 20, 2005 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

 

Hubble Probes Strange Blue Light

 

Astronomer Ivan King of the University of Washington and colleagues first spotted the strange blue light in 1995 with the Hubble telescope. He thought the light might have come from a single, bright blue star or perhaps from a more exotic energetic process. Three years later, Lauer and Sandra Faber of the University of California at Santa Cruz used Hubble again to study the blue light. Their observations indicated that the blue light was a cluster of blue stars.

 

Now, new spectroscopic observations by Hubble's Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) reveal that the blue light consists of more than 400 stars that formed in a burst of activity about 200 million years ago. The stars are tightly packed in a disk that is only a light-year across. The disk is nested inside an elliptical ring of older, cooler, redder stars, which was seen in previous Hubble observations.

 

The astronomers also used STIS to measure the velocities of those stars. They obtained the stars' speeds by calculating how much their light waves are stretched and compressed as they travel around the black hole. Under the black hole's gravitational grip, the stars are traveling very fast: 2.2 million miles an hour (3.6 million kilometers an hour, or 1,000 kilometers a second). They are moving so fast that it would take them 40 seconds to circle the Earth and six minutes to arrive at the Moon. The fastest stars complete an orbit in 100 years.

 

Andromeda's active core probably made similar disks of stars in the past and may continue to make them.

 

"The blue stars in the disk are so short-lived that it is unlikely in the long 12-billion-year history of Andromeda that such a short-lived disk would appear now," Lauer said. "That's why we think that the mechanism that formed this disk of stars probably formed other stellar disks in the past and will trigger them again in the future. We still don't know, however, how such a disk could form in the first place. It still remains an enigma."

 

The astronomers credit Hubble's superb vision for finding the disk.

 

"Only Hubble has the resolution in blue light to observe this disk," said team member Richard Green of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory in Tucson. "It is so small and so distinct from the surrounding red stars that we were able to use it to probe into the very dynamical heart of Andromeda. These observations were taken by the members of our team that built STIS. We designed its visible channel specifically to seize such an opportunity - to measure starlight closer to a black hole than in any other galaxy outside our own."

 

Solid Evidence for a Monster Black Hole

 

In addition to the discovery of the disk of stars, the astronomers used this uniquely close look at Andromeda to prove unambiguously that the galaxy hosts a central black hole. In 1988, in independent ground-based studies, John Kormendy and the team of Alan Dressler and Douglas Richstone discovered a central dark object in Andromeda that they believed was a supermassive black hole. This was the first strong case for what are now 40 detections of black holes, most of them made by Hubble. Those observations, however, did not definitively rule out other, very exotic, and far less likely, alternatives.

 

"There are compelling reasons to believe that these are supermassive black holes," Kormendy said. "But extreme claims require extraordinarily strong evidence. We have to be sure that these are black holes and not dark clusters of dead stars."

 

The STIS observations of Andromeda are so precise that astronomers have eliminated all other possibilities for what the central, dark object could be. They also calculated that the black hole's mass is 140 million Suns, which is three times more massive than once thought.

 

So far, dark clusters have definitively been ruled out in only two galaxies, NGC 4258 and our galaxy, the Milky Way. "These two galaxies give us unambiguous proof that black holes exist," Kormendy added. "But both are special cases - NGC 4258 contains a disk of water masers that we observe with radio telescopes, and our galactic center is so close that we can follow individual stellar orbits. Andromeda is the first galaxy in which we can exclude all exotic alternatives to a black hole using Hubble and using the same techniques by which we find almost all supermassive black holes."

 

"Studying black holes always was a primary mission of Hubble," Kormendy said. "Nailing the black hole in Andromeda is without a doubt an important part of its legacy. It makes us much more confidant that the other central dark objects detected in galaxies are black holes, too."

 

"Now that we have proven that the black hole is at the center of the disk of blue stars, the formation of these stars becomes hard to understand," Bender added. "Gas that might form stars must spin around the black hole so quickly - and so much more quickly near the black hole than farther out - that star formation looks almost impossible. But the stars are there."

 

A Galaxy's Active Core

 

The black hole and the disk of stars are not the only pieces of architecture in Andromeda's core. A team led by Lauer and Faber used Hubble in 1993 to discover that the galaxy appears to have a double cluster of stars at its center. This finding was a surprise, because two clusters should merge into one in only a few hundred thousand years. Scott Tremaine of Princeton University solved this problem by suggesting that the "double nucleus" was actually a ring of old, red stars. The ring looked like two star clusters because astronomers were only seeing the stars on the opposite ends of the ring. The ring is about five light-years from the black hole and its surrounding disk of blue stars. The disk and the ring are tilted at the same angle as viewed from Earth, suggesting that they may be related.

 

Although astronomers are surprised to find a blue disk of stars swirling around a supermassive black hole, they also say the puzzling architecture may not be that unusual.

 

"The dynamics within the core of this neighboring galaxy may be more common than we think," Lauer explained. "Our own Milky Way apparently has even younger stars close to its own black hole. It seems unlikely that only the closest two big galaxies should have this odd activity. So this behavior may not be the exception but the rule. And we have found other galaxies that have a double nucleus."

 

Source: HubbleSite

[ldsoftwaresteve]

Very interesting. Perhaps there are no tidal forces after all.

Steve

[infamous]

At long last science has unambiguous proof for the existence of black holes. This should rock the boats of a few theorists that believed that black holes were just a convenient invention for science to explain the unknown.

[ldsoftwaresteve]

Perhaps I missed the significance of this. I thought that the disk of stars was in a place it shouldn't be. I assumed that meant it was too close, perhaps inside of the theoretical event horizon?

[C1ay]

Perhaps I missed the significance of this. I thought that the disk of stars was in a place it shouldn't be. I assumed that meant it was too close, perhaps inside of the theoretical event horizon?

That's the same impression I have from the article, i.e. "Astronomers are perplexed about how the pancake-shaped disk of stars could form so close to a giant black hole. In such a hostile environment, the black hole's tidal forces should tear matter apart, making it difficult for gas and dust to collapse and form stars."

[infamous]

That's the same impression I have from the article, i.e. "Astronomers are perplexed about how the pancake-shaped disk of stars could form so close to a giant black hole.

Absolutely, I was however making an observation about another fact that the article brought to the attention of those that had doubts about the proveable existence for black holes. I believe this evidence should put to rest the question about whether black holes truly exist, seeing as how this debate has been going on for some time now between theorists.

[CraigD]

Perhaps I missed the significance of this. I thought that the disk of stars was in a place it shouldn't be. I assumed that meant it was too close, perhaps inside of the theoretical event horizon?

That's the same impression I have from the article, i.e. "Astronomers are perplexed about how the pancake-shaped disk of stars could form so close to a giant black hole. In such a hostile environment, the black hole's tidal forces should tear matter apart, making it difficult for gas and dust to collapse and form stars."

If the disk of blue stars were within the supermassive black hole’s event horizon, no light from them would escape it to reach the Hubble. If it were even very close, strange but unmysterious spectra of young blue stars shifted far into the red would be detected.

 

I think you’re correct, ldsoftwaresteve, that the article’s saying the disk is in a place it shouldn’t be. I think the explanation being presented, however, is that the disk is close enough to the supermassive that gravitational tidal forces – the normally slight difference in gravitational attraction between objects slightly closer to the center of rotation than those slightly further away, responsible for such effects as tethers released in earth orbit orienting themselves vertically – should interfere with the relatively delicate process of star formation, preventing them from forming. Present theory suggest that what we should be seeing is a disk of hot, disorganized matter emitting in the x-ray spectrum, a scaled-up version of the “accretion disks” believed to surround stellar-mass black holes (strong x-ray sources are the traditional mark of stellar-size black holes).

 

Because these stars’ spectra identify them as short-lived, the explanation that they formed further out, where tidal forces were slighter, then spiraled inward, seems ruled out. Since they’re short-lived, it’s unlikely we’re catching some sort of special, one-time occurance. More likely, star formation in this disk is a continuous ongoing process, so the explanation that the black hole’s gravity was less intense when they were formed seems ruled out.

 

What seems left is that the usual model of star formation is inadequate to describe how these stars are forming. Instead of coalescing gently from a pre-planetary gas/dust cloud, as our solar system did, these may have formed in a rougher way from vigorously churning clouds, possibly due to compression as clouds collided with one another.

 

This is exciting stuff, great fun to try modeling on a computer (though I’ve largely given up my armature attempt at this, content to leave it to the pros, and read about their results).