Vmedvil5 Posted April 9, 2022 Report Posted April 9, 2022 It seems that Sen. Rubio has thought of the most likely scenario regarding Russia usage of Chemical and Biological weapons, read more at https://www.foxnews.com/media/sen-rubio-likeliest-scenario-russias-chemical-biological-weapons Quote
LaurieAG Posted April 9, 2022 Report Posted April 9, 2022 https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/may/18/marco-rubio/rubios-statements-iraq-have-shifted-not-flipped/ Quote In earlier interviews, Rubio said that the United States is safer having gone to war and that it wasn’t a mistake -- but in those interviews he wasn’t directly asked the question about whether he would have favored the invasion, had we known in 2003 that we had faulty intelligence. Rubio was asked May 13 if he would have been in favor of the Iraq War if it was known at the time that there were no weapons of mass destruction. Rubio said, "Not only would I not have been in favor of it. President Bush would not have been in favor of it." As for what he would have favored if it had been known that there were no weapons, Rubio said on May 17 that it was unlikely that Congress would have given approval for Bush to move forward. All these statements seem a little different, and add up to a partial change of position. We rate Rubio’s statements on Iraq as a Half Flip. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.