Kizzi Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 Every scientist has to make a living. So isn't this going to corrupt the results of science when the scientist, who has to continue making a living, gets results that won't be to their employer's favour? Whilst developing a new drug, if results come back saying the new drug is useless, aren't the developers risking the sack if their truthful, cause they really are saying 'we failed'? Bosses want results. If the scientists tell the bosses what they want to hear they'll continue to get paid. But they have to live with the problem and will most probably be found out later. I guess this all says, if your going to be a scientist, you've got to be a successful one! How many unsuccessful scientists lie drinking in the rubbish bin? Or in the real world does only 1 out of 100 scientists come up with good results, and have the bosses come to realize this and accept this? Maybe it's easy to be creative and progress science along the path? Mabey being a scientist is easy............if done in little steps?!!!!! Kizzi :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted September 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 What does it take to be a good & successful scientist? Kizzi :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormod Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 The question is basically the same as "what does it take to be a good teacher". Does the use of teachers in schools corrupt schools? Will all successful teachers be doing the same kind of job? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted September 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 I suppose what ever type of occupation one chooses, one has to be successful, because if your not the boss isn't going to be too happy. But at the end of the day we're all human, and we all make mistakes, so no boss is going to be 100% happy. Someone once told me that employment positions are filled with people who can't do their job........people get promoted and promoted until they end up doing not too well because it's generally more difficult the higher you go, so they don't get promoted no more.....therefore positions are filled with people who can only do half their jobs!!!!! If only they could get domoted one more time! No one wants to see unhappy employees worrying about mortgages and feeding the kids. Kizzi :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted September 27, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 I just want to say in my opinion............ that this thread should be destroyed since it may put off impressional budding scientists from doing science at university. The scientists are the heros.Scientists get my vote.They take us one step at a time into the future.Scientists along with people who work for charity. KiZzI :D ;) ;) :D :) :D :D :D ;) :D :D :D :D :D :D Turtle 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 Someone once told me that employment positions are filled with people who can't do their job........people get promoted and promoted until they end up doing not too well because it's generally more difficult the higher you go, so they don't get promoted no more.....therefore positions are filled with people who can only do half their jobs!!!!!Kizzi :) This is called the Peter Principle & states that people in an organization will rise to their level of incompetence. People misbehave at all levels & occupations & it doesn't always take incompetence to point out a bosses new clothes. MOTC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fishteacher73 Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 SCience is refinement after accident. Most of our major scientific brak throughs occured because of some random accident. The scientist then thought, "Hey, thats wierd. I wonder why so and so happened in this instance?" This is where scientists either make it or break it... Observation in the subtle variations and causes opens up vast areas to be explored.Much of new science is like art. It just kind of happens. Then the comunity then contiues to refine and examine new ideas and possiblities. Turtle 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.