Why Nuclear Fusion Could Be The Key To Air Superiority

[Vmedvil5]

It seems nuclear fusion could be the key to air superiority with fusion powered aircraft, read more at Why Nuclear Fusion Could Be The Key To Air Superiority (slashgear.com)

 

P.S. This has already been discussed in the (Fusion Powered Hypersonic Missiles For Traveling At 67,000 mph - Engineering and Applied Science - Science Forums) thread which I think fusion powered aircraft would be a great idea too.

 

Edited November 10, 2022 by Vmedvil5

[Moontanman]

On 11/10/2022 at 5:43 AM, Vmedvil5 said:

It seems nuclear fusion could be the key to air superiority with fusion powered aircraft, read more at Why Nuclear Fusion Could Be The Key To Air Superiority (slashgear.com)

 

P.S. This has already been discussed in the (Fusion Powered Hypersonic Missiles For Traveling At 67,000 mph - Engineering and Applied Science - Science Forums) thread which I think fusion powered aircraft would be a great idea too.

 

How do you deal with the mass of the radiation shielding in an aircraft? 

Edited November 14, 2022 by Moontanman

[Moontanman]

22 hours ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

What happens when run out of stuff to fuse

The universe is full of fusionable hydrogen and helium isotopes. 

22 hours ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

What happen if run out of energy to keep fusion device running

Controlled fusion implies it creates more energy than it take to keep the reaction going. If it can't run itself then you don't have controlled fusion. 

22 hours ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

Because it’s not stable fusion, so when you get a fusion reaction it doesn’t give off more than it takes to reignite fusion.

See the above answer. 

[Moontanman]

23 hours ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

The problem with getting to the universe is finite rocket fuel. You need a way it can run on electricity, electricity is more abundant than rocket fuel. You know how many electrons reside in the atoms of this earth? You know how much energy it costs to convert other chemicals into rocket fuel and how much those chemicals cost? Another issue is how much fuel you stuff into your rocket, makes it weigh more and thus adds resistance to the propulsion's thrust reducing top speed. If there were a cheap way to use proton beams to produce gravitational waves that expand faster than normal high speeds could be achieved at very low running time. 

That fusion fuel is contained with it Earth's ocean, 100s of thousands of years worth. Do you science at all? What are you... about 12 years old and watch superman for your science knowledge? 

[Vmedvil5]

On 11/14/2022 at 9:35 AM, Moontanman said:

How do you deal with the mass of the radiation shielding in an aircraft? 

I am not exactly certain however I think that the fusion powered spacecraft's additional lift from the reaction can handle the additional radiation shielding. Don't quote me on that the Fusion Powered Hypersonic Missiles did not have human pilots, so it wasn't really an issue.

Edited November 16, 2022 by Vmedvil5

[Moontanman]

21 hours ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

The fuel consumed per rocket launch isn’t worth the payload, it has to run longer because of it’s weight which in turn wastes more fuel in order to get anywhere. Whereas if you can use lasers to bend gravity after continuous electric burn it can coast off the top speed achieved on very low electric power because it doesn’t have to run continuously. It coasts off momentum in a vacuum because it’s escaped orbit.

 

So now you are just talking nonsense. 

[Moontanman]

22 hours ago, Vmedvil5 said:

I am not exactly certain however I think that the fusion powered spacecraft's additional lift from the reaction can handle the additional radiation shielding. Don't quote me on that the Fusion Powered Hypersonic Missiles did not have human pilots, so it wasn't really an issue.

We do not have and have never had fusion powered aircraft of any kind. In fact we do not have controlled fusion. Are you talking about fission by chance 

[Vmedvil5]

1 hour ago, Moontanman said:

We do not have and have never had fusion powered aircraft of any kind. In fact we do not have controlled fusion. Are you talking about fission by chance 

I am saying from experiments with the technology, link = The Fusion Driven Rocket: Nuclear Propulsion | NASA

[Moontanman]

20 hours ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

Anyway the earth is running out of fossil fuels, thus gas prices are rising. Electric cars are slower and can't get to a destination as expediently as aerial vehicle seen in the gimbal vid which use electric powered proton beams, electric generated from AM reactions as per Bob Lazar/Timothy Greer's descriptions, to create what he defined as anti-gravity, when the disc "turns sideways" he says, like in the video. Therefore even without antimatter, an electric version of it doesn't use as much electricity as an electric car to get from point a to point b. 

So you do get your science from fantasy, I guess if you can't dazzle with brilliance you must baffle them with bullshit. Butt I can put your ignorant *** on ignore. 

 

Edited November 18, 2022 by Moontanman

[Moontanman]

20 hours ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

Sure we do, the sun! We just don't have enough rocket fuel on this planet to utilize it to make enough antimatter to last forever using rocket propulsion. 

More nonsensical bullshit, good thing I'm not a moderator I'd ban you...