pgrmdave Posted February 27, 2005 Report Posted February 27, 2005 Razeroth - your post, while though out, is not scientific. You claim that There is however more proof of God then there is proof that thier is not one. and that Likewise he can not allow himself to be universaly proven, such would undermine the faith of so many that found him without proof, and would jeoperdize our agency in that we could no longer chose not to believe.So, which is it? Either there is more proof of him or he cannot have any proof. If I awoke one morning and described to you a dream I had, would you call me liar and demand solid physical evidence that such a dream had actually occured? No, you believe that I had indeed had such a drea, no matter how unbelievable it seemed, on the standpoint that I had no reason to lie and that we all have dreams.But would we think that the dream was reality?
Queso Posted February 27, 2005 Report Posted February 27, 2005 No. There is no proof that there is a God. If you disagree please provide some testable proof. this argument will eventually lead to what they call "biblical proof"what the hell is this? i've never understood.
jp3089 Posted February 28, 2005 Report Posted February 28, 2005 I believe in God, and He means a lot to me, but I can't prove him to anyone. I'm ok with people if they don't want to believe in God, but I personally feel that my life is better with God as a major factor. This is true for me, but there's not a single way in the world to PROVE this to anyone else. What do you guys think? -jp
Tormod Posted February 28, 2005 Report Posted February 28, 2005 This thread is very old. Please start new threads instead of replying to very old topics.
Recommended Posts