steelengineer Posted October 31, 2005 Report Posted October 31, 2005 it's probably some bad math trick, like differentiating a constant and then integrating it.....try it and see if it works. Quote
learnin to learn Posted November 2, 2005 Report Posted November 2, 2005 :confused: :edizzy: :frown: :xx: :doh: :) :confused: :confused: Quote
bartock Posted November 2, 2005 Report Posted November 2, 2005 :confused: now everyone knows 6+6=36 or is it 6x6=12?:confused: i am so confused:shrug: :confused:you must be talking about another universe Quote
learnin to learn Posted November 4, 2005 Report Posted November 4, 2005 you must be talking about another universe I might be...:hihi: thats for you to find out Quote
Edge Posted November 4, 2005 Report Posted November 4, 2005 1 = 0 That comes from a mathematical fallacy. Proof that 0 equals 1: Start with the addition of an infinite succession of zero's 0 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ... Then recognize that 0 = 1 − 1 0 = (1 - 1) + (1 - 1) + ... Applying the associative law of addition results in 0 = 1 + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + (-1 + 1) + ... Of course − 1 + 1 = 0 0 = 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ... And the addition of an infinite string of zero's can be discarded leaving 0 = 1 Q.E.D. The error here is that the associative law cannot be applied freely to an infinite sum unless the sum would converge without any parentheses. In this particular argument, the second line gives the sequence of partial sums 0, 0, 0, ... (which converges to 0) while the third line gives the sequence of partial sums 1, 1, 1, ... (which converges to 1), so it is unclear in what sense these expressions can be considered equal. Source There are other mathematical fallacies in there as well. CraigD 1 Quote
bartock Posted November 4, 2005 Report Posted November 4, 2005 I might be...:hihi: thats for you to find outok lets find out. where are you from? Quote
learnin to learn Posted November 9, 2005 Report Posted November 9, 2005 I am from the grat universe of Alabama =)WHere eveythang be backwerds :friday: Quote
wizzkid67 Posted November 23, 2005 Report Posted November 23, 2005 if u divide by zero u can end up with a stupid answer like 1=0 right first a=b multiply both sides by a gives a^2=ab add a^2-2ab to both sides and simplifi 2(a^2-ab)=a^2-ab divide both sides by a^2-ab gives 2=1 subtact 1 from both sides gives 1=0 which is a total break down of logic Quote
Tormod Posted November 23, 2005 Report Posted November 23, 2005 divide both sides by a^2-ab gives 2=1...which is a total break down of logic I disagree - it's not a breakdown of logic. If anything it shows that we do not understand too well how to use zero in division. Division by zero is illogical because we cannot express it in a rational way. Quote
wizzkid67 Posted November 23, 2005 Report Posted November 23, 2005 I disagree - it's not a breakdown of logic. If anything it shows that we do not understand too well how to use zero in division. Division by zero is illogical because we cannot express it in a rational way. i believe u just used a bad bit of logic there Quote
learnin to learn Posted December 1, 2005 Report Posted December 1, 2005 if u divide by zero u can end up with a stupid answer like 1=0 right first a=b multiply both sides by a gives a^2=ab add a^2-2ab to both sides and simplifi 2(a^2-ab)=a^2-ab divide both sides by a^2-ab gives 2=1 subtact 1 from both sides gives 1=0 which is a total break down of logicI am totally confused!!!!! Quote
wizzkid67 Posted December 1, 2005 Report Posted December 1, 2005 because a=b a*a-a*b is like saying a*a-a*a which is zero and since u cant devide by zero it breaks down the logic of mathematics giving u stupid answers it was stuff like this that people were sending in when fermet last therom had not be proved and they offered money for the proof Quote
learnin to learn Posted December 2, 2005 Report Posted December 2, 2005 because a=b a*a-a*b is like saying a*a-a*a which is zero and since u cant devide by zero it breaks down the logic of mathematics giving u stupid answers it was stuff like this that people were sending in when fermet last therom had not be proved and they offered money for the proof so b*b-b*b = a*a-a*a??? and they both = zero? so 2*2-2*2=0 oh crap I get it!!!!!!! I was not useing order of operations!!!!! I am sorry I was having a blonde moment:eek_big: Quote
Edge Posted December 2, 2005 Report Posted December 2, 2005 Please avoid mathematical fallacies. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.