Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

i don't know.

think about it, the only way to know if light could travel for a year would be to take a light a lightyear away, turn it on and see if it takes a year for us to see it.

Posted

Well obviously this isn't a question about the *speed* of light since we can measure that over short distances in the lab and we've got extremely consistent data on that. And we've got our "light bulb"--Pioneer X--now out to about 12 billion kilometers or half a light day, and while thats about 1/700th of the distance you're asking about, its far enough to start to show some "weakening" of the "light" (electromagnetic transmissions are equivalent), which we don't see. if it were going to wink out completely before it hit 1 light year, we'd see some weakening by now but we don't.

 

So the conclusion is, it sure looks like light travels at least a light year if not more, and absent some theory about how that light that's clearly much further away (note that anything only a light year away would show *huge* measurable parallax with existing telescopes, so we know this stuff is really far a way) gets to us while something a light year away would not be strong enough to get to us, its pretty much proven that yes, indeed, light can travel a distance longer than a light year....

 

QED,

Buffy

Posted
So the conclusion is, it sure looks like light travels at least a light year if not more, and absent some theory about how that light that's clearly much further away (note that anything only a light year away would show *huge* measurable parallax with existing telescopes, so we know this stuff is really far a way) gets to us while something a light year away would not be strong enough to get to us, its pretty much proven that yes, indeed, light can travel a distance longer than a light year....

this is based on the theory that stars are lightyears away, there's no possible way to know for sure.

the atom bomb looked great on paper, but for some dumb reason they tested it anyway :)

Posted
i just had an amazing thought :)

there is no way to know if light can travel for a year. :)

The corollary to that is that all stars, galaxies, pulsars, etc. are less that one light year from Earth yet trigonometric parallax tells us otherwise. Are you implying that this method of mathematical derivation of star distance could be flawed?

Posted
The corollary to that is that all stars, galaxies, pulsars, etc. are less that one light year from Earth yet trigonometric parallax tells us otherwise. Are you implying that this method of mathematical derivation of star distance could be flawed?

test it on a star and see.

but then you must first know how far away the star is.

maybe flawed, maybe not :)

how can we know?

Posted
but then you must first know how far away the star is.

how can we know?

No, surveyors use parallax all of the time to measure distances to things they can't access and don't already know the distance to. Did you read my link or Tormod's?

Posted
No, surveyors use parallax all of the time to measure distances to things they can't access and don't already know the distance to. Did you read my link or Tormod's?

tormod's

Posted
I have a serious question for you goku, do you believe that man actually landed on the moon?

yep, but i have relatives that don't and they never thought to question star distance or light year.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...