Walking Stick & The Turtle discuss Total Field Theory

[That Rascal Puff]

Dear Turtle & Tormod:

Are you and/or Tormod tweaked w' me for any reason?

 

If so, besides its duration, which InfmyStdfst has already understandably critically commented on, might you, Turtle be 'ticked', because I posted portions of what was said on this private message thread, on the 'What IS space' thread? Including the commentary that you seem not to be 'inhibited' about saying positive things about my Unified Field gravity book? Should I, in your perspective, not have posted on Sergey500's thread, any of what was for the most part, earlier posted here?

Is it uncricket to include information that passes between us here, elsewhere? Should I have said that you seem to be 'unintimidated', rather than 'uninhibited', with regard to your response to my request that you post a favorable message about myself, which you promptly did - and do you now regret doing that because it makes you appear to be my 'yes-man', and/or lackey? Please let me know what you think in this context I'm subjecting here, Mr. Turtle.

Also, will you please tell me what the apparent acronym: 'jndrdlpmilt?!', means?

It's the last message I know of that you've sent to me, and I don't know whether to be apprehensive about your translation, or not (I am tentatively afraid to ask?)

Do you feel that you are being 'used' by me, in my speaking of you as someone who's read and (at least use to) recognize, acknowledge, understand and ostensibly respect my work, and myself personally for that matter?

Are you 'miffed', at the post I placed immediately after your positive stance taken on 'What IS space' thread - that says among other things that you don't seem to be 'inhibited' about speaking in favor of my book; which is in fact generally and alternately put down or alternately ignored on - and sometimes completely hacked out of - especially science forum and other internet posts? In a series of cases of my very effective defense of self and counteroffense against my - aggressively employed - self proclaimed - often odious aspersion casting adversaries; their since discredited attacks against myself (TRP, etceteras), and, TRP's very effective counterstatements have been displaced by lengthy Shakespeare quotes. I would remind anyone who attends to giving thought to my posts and content, that in a recent case of a group of very real people, very measurably creating a website, the URL of which was *'whykbrsucks.tripod.com', and then *'whykbrsucks2' - posted, in the 'mission'-labeled objective of bashing and otherwise demonizing Truly Yours, on the transparently false premises that what was said about and against me was 'true'; with a very busy and accomodating series of - Guest Commentary hate letters directed at and otherwise monstrously subjecting K.B. Robertson? Did you ever encounter that website. I have it on disc, in time I will post - and narrate - it, myself.

 

Would you care to see this forensic evidence now? I am altogether uninhibited and unintimidated to send you (Turtle & Tormod), or Infmy, or IrishEyes a copy if and when any of you may wish to draw your own conclusions regarding what I'm talking about, in the Orwellian Dept. of 'Four Minutes of Daily Hate', and/or the replicated - 1984 - 'Ministry of Truth & Justice' (the entire hate-site that was on the net for nearly a year)...

 

(Have you entered 'Kent Benjamin Robertson', 'Gravity Is The 4th Dimension', and/or 'Brian Kirk Parquette' - 'Bkparque' in Google and beheld the array of regular commentary, thickly interspersed with hate messages and/or altogether hacked out messages, in many cases replaced with Shakespeare quotes and duplicated in lengthy columns? Have you learned - are you aware, have I told you, do you recall? - that the creators and contributors of the *above two URLs were ordered by a judge in a court of law, to remove the above described websites, after I was summoned to 'Family Court', by a shirt tail relative (who was opposed to my marriage to my wife, who the adversaries are related to) and an anonymous mob of 'people' who agreed with him, in alleging that I was a 'dangerous threat' to himself and a number of his friends, including their wives, sweethearts, children and friends... And, that all of those hugely false accusations were capitulated by my opposition, which also repeatedly purjured itself, in a court of law, after the hate site was posted and active between December of '03 and November of 04; at which time it was belatedly removed by court order, which was not carried out - was found in contempt of court - until seven months after the antagonists were court-ordered to remove the describe hatesite (which boasted a 'hit count' of nearly 5,000 - many of which were a handful of people's artificialized, agreeably reinforcing, mock 'dialogues' with themselves...)

 

Are you offended by me for issuing these circumstances to you, and/or on the net, as I have (out of an imposed obligation to defend myself)?

 

Is there a particular portention in Tormod's general absence from this post (IrishEyes explained from the start, after humbling me with her respect for my work and myself, that she would for the most part simply observe, rather than engage in active participation on this subject at this private message thread or any other, on or off the public access net), other than, perhaps, the approximate posturing explained by IrishEyes?

 

Tormod: In your post at 'THE DANG NEAR EVERYTHING ('cept Final) THEORY', at forums.delphiforums.com -KaiduOrkhon's Forum, the only 'message' imarted by you is a punctuational period ('dot'), like this: .

Is that a very interesting and imaginative way of commenting on the Buckminster Fuller quote I posted, where (in an essay entitled '4-D TIMELOCK', Mr. Fuller clarifies that the geometric point from which any One Dimensional Straight Line - and the ensuing commencement of perpediculars to that One D Straight Line, becomes a 2-D Plane, becomes a 3-D Solid, becomes the 4th Dimension, and, that it isn't a 'supercube', as it is traditionally depicted: all due to the fact that the non-existent geometric 'Point' is spheroidally round, rather than cubically square?

:)

Tormod & Turtle: will one or preferably each of you please, please respond - however you choose - to this series of perhaps tedious and disconcerting questions in this post?

 

I am altogether prepared to respectfully field any question either or any of you may ask.

 

:)

 

I remain altogether respectfully and gratefully,

K.B. Robertson,

AKA Puff, etceteras.

[Turtle]

Hi Rascal Puff The Magic Dragon; I love that song by the way. Use to listen to it with my family while we traveled.

 

I am not ticked, peeved, pissed, miffed, chaffed, cheesed, torqued, or otherwise angry by any other word. Seems what we all have in common is a sense of humor. Don't get your loin cloth in a knot as the old saying goes.

 

The case of things is that I have made a join of sorts of all I ever read/heard/experienced. Mr. Robertson's "Gravity is the 4th Dimension", joined with Fuller's geometry, joined with my katabataks, joined with what the old masters say, joined with my personal experimentation. A new language in other words, and I need some time to learn it & then re-read the important stuff with my dictionary in hand.

 

Happy Halcyon Days. Look up "halcyon" every-one. Don't get your loin clots in a knot.:)

[That Rascal Puff]

Thank you, Turtle:

(We needed that.)

Interrogatives with ? question marks are usually Molly's vernacular style. But here we have a statement. (Ship happens). Exactamente.

Okay Campers. All's well. Please, let's all stay in touch here for reasons which will make themselves known as they always have a way of doing. Got a few chores to do. Also focused on composing a letter to the Vets Admin - in time the entire damned thing will be posted on the net. It's a corker, as the old folks use to say.

((While they were traveling?))

(What did the butcher say, when he cut off the pig's tail?)

((We give up, Mom.))

Okay, Molly what did the butcher say.

(((Under the stipulated conditions.)))

(Uhm. It won't be long, now?)

((Shall I say 'G'night, Gracie'?))

((You just did?))

 

Yer a heck of a good sport, Turtle.

(And the other guys, certainly including IrishEyes?)

((Yes. All of you guys in the outfields and the dugouts are also heck of a good spots, I mean sports, also?))

Who's on 1st. I don't know's on second, and I don't give a damn is shortstop?) ((Who's pitching?))

Damn it, she just told us he's on 1st, and Who doesn't care if I don't know's on second?

((G'night Gracie?))

(((See you in St. Louis, or Ebbet's Field?)))

 

(Not to be remiss regarding checking in here, once in a while, OK?)

 

:)

- Puff

[IrishEyes]

Geez, take a week for a wake and end up with a tome to digest upon your return.

It'll take me a bit to get through this all, so please be patient with me while I try to figure out which end is up, ok, guys?

Looks like things are moving along swimmingly here though.

I still have very little clue what you guys are talking about, i really need to print this thread out and read it through thoroughly, instead of the hit-or-miss time I've been getting lately. And Tormod would kill me if he knew that I have only been checking this thread the past few days instead of the rest of the site. When I've only got about 10 mins on a day, I have to pri-or-it-ize... you know?

I'll be back...

[Turtle]

Thank you, Turtle:

(We needed that.)

((G'night Gracie?))

(((See you in St. Louis, or Ebbet's Field?)))

 

(Not to be remiss regarding checking in here, once in a while, OK?)

 

:)

- Puff

Bitte. Eine gegegengesunheiten [geshundheit(sp)} ist recht meine mutti sagt.

I miss a lot here myself as I go off to check up on myself; see what condition my condition is in so to speak. Any one kan e-mail me at [email protected] to bring my attention to important matters. Off to find that Dymaxion Map.

 

Welcome back Irish & a Happy Halcyon Holidays to You & Yours. That Nemo is unfathomable too. :hihi:

[infamous]

:hihi:

 

 

 

"It was formerly believed that if all material things disappeared out of the universe, time and space would be left. According to the relativity theory, howwever, time and space disappear together with the things."

Absolutely Puff; Space, Time, Gravity, and Electromagnetism are all interdependent upon one another. Neither can exist without the support of all the rest.

 

 

 

 

"The basis of the denial of the fourth dimension, which has been supported by the theoretical and fallacious plane and cubical geometry, has been the inability to produce an additional or fourth perpendicular to a cube, as the basis of an additional power multiplication, whereas, poor little plane arithmetic and algebra, without geomentrical reference, being abstract, indicate the perfect ability to do so.

I really like the way you have described this misinterpretation of spatial reality. I have long been mystified by the inability of the scientific community to recognize that the basic structure of the universe is the Sphere. Just look around the universe, does anyone observe cubical planets orbiting as yet unobserved cubical stars?? Later on Mr. Puff, I will present you with some unsual math with this aspect of reality in focus................Infy

[Queso]

the universe is shaped like jazz, duh.

[Turtle]

the universe is shaped like jazz, duh.

 

___As politely as possible, this is not on topic. Either relate comments directly to particulars of Mr. Robertson's book Gravity is the Fourth Dimension, or withhold them.

___I continue to read & re-read the work & others by the author as well, in spite of his absense on business. While I enjoy a good jest or turn of word, I have every affirmnative adjective modifying serious intent in this thread & its subject. :cup:

http://einstein.periphery.cc/index.htm

[Turtle]

___I sallied afield a bit, & now pass by this shore once more.

"It is agreed on all hands that the only principle which could serve as the basis of quantum theory would be one that constituted a translation of a field theory into the scheme of quantum statistics."

- Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 334

 

"'Empty space' is not the absence of 4-D matter, but rather, a physical 5 & 6 dimensional (electromagnetic) extension of it." - p. 60 GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION, by Kent B. Robertson, Copyright August 1988

 

"No amount of collection of facts could lead to these equations unless the Principle of General Relativity were used. This is the reason why all attempts to obtain a deeper knowledge of the foundations of physics seem doomed to me unless the basic concepts are in accordance with General Relativity from the beginning." - Albert Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 352.

___I bolded the point of my interest, i.e. statistics in Albert's commentary. I now have in mind to make whichever right turn clarifies the use of statistics in regard to gravity as the 4th dimension, electricity the 5th & magnetism the 6th dimension.

___Statistical residues; yeah...that's the ticket.:xparty:

PS Attached impression fbfbtbsbs

[Turtle]

From my first post to hthis thread:

___Here I wish to discourse with Rascal Puff on the subject of his original work of 1959. I intend it to fully engage the stated purpose of the Lounge area with lengthy posts...,

 

From the Lounge Rules, this is the stated purpose I implied by the bolded quote above:

Sometimes the heated debate in the forums can be off-putting. Some topics require more contemplation. Some issues are worth a more in-depth exploration and require longer posts and longer replies. Some topics are simply good to discuss without any real direction at all.

 

This is the forum for that kind of discussions.

 

___Through whatever mis-communication, I have lost some of the lengthy posts here that I have under discussion; portions remain in my replies to specifics in those lengthy posts by That Rascal Puff. The posts remain lost, but I intend to continue with the discussion in regard to my original stated purpose; to discuss the implications of the truth of the work first published in 1959 by Kent Benjamin Robertson titled Gravity is the 4th Dimension. This work is seminal in affirming conclusions long held by Einstein himself as well as other luminaries of physics like Feyeman. This is a REAL DEAL.

___If you, dear reader, have familiarized yourself with my original works offered here through the gracious daring of Tormod et al, you may know once I lock on to the smallest sniff of Truth I work it right down to the minutest nugget, form, & iota. I have taken a log out of my eye & the better I see for it.

[Turtle]

Now it is true I tend to not pen long posts myself, but I do read them. Every word of them. Sometimes twice or more. The reason is, I'm a generalist in the strictest syllogistic logical terms. I draw relatively small conclusions from floods of specifcs. The main problem in this approach is that it doesn't work well in the short runs, i.e. drawing inductive conclusions on too few specifics. The main benefit of generalism however is quite fruitful after a large amount of time & specifics.

 

To whit, the unified field as described by Rascal Puff Dragon. Having also recently engaged in some lengthy ongoing study of Fuller's Synergetics when I first read Puff's posts, I saw the general commonality of geometry between the 2.

Having also recently conducted some experiments with magnets here, I rather had a vivid hands-on image of the right angle relations in regard to magnetism. Although I haven't taken that further, the next step is of cours to replace the permanent magnet with an electro-magnetic & repeat the demonstrations. This adds another right angle relationship that is hands-on experiencibly sensorial.

So now I have experiencible "invisable" fields & they are nested. I have been doing these experiments since I was little as have many of you. So in general, if these two - magnetism & electricity - nest in a constant energetic action right angle situation, I see the logical conclusions Rascal Puff drew in Gravity is the 4th Dimension match my own conclusions about the geometry of nature from Fuller, Mandlebrot, Hofstader, Turing, Euler, etc. etc.

Either a theory violates the rules or it does not, nonetheless that this is no proof of a theory. The theory of the Unified Field Gravity is the 4th Dimension, does not violate the rules. In fact, as I study more it is shaping up that it is the rules.:)

[Turtle]

Quote from:

http://einstein.periphery.cc/gravity.htm

 

The forthcoming excerpt from Newton's Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA is precluded here with the clarification that, even today gravity is colloquially thought-of and popularly accepted definitively as a pulling force of attraction; originating at the centers of individual material objects (particles - charges; systems of same); the force of which increases proportionately with increasing mass values. This definition has always been a categorical presumption applied to the unknown identity of gravity, for the sake of convenience and for apparent lack of any oth er alternative definition.

 

Newton himself, understandably had difficulty accepting the existence of an 'invisible force' which he describes as 'occult', having the power to move apples and planets. Above all, he (very specifically) found - proved - the large force of the orbiting moon directly linked to the same mysterious force applying to the apple's inspiration for falling, above and upon the earth's surface. The aquatic, atomospheric and terrestrial tides. The planets orbiting the sun.

 

It was formerly thought that gravitational forces acting on earth were much different than forces acting elsewhere in the larger realm of solar system and universe.

 

Newton, established for the first time, that it - the universal realms of the large and small - is all connected by a singular, commonly acting, unidentified invisible force. That is the gist of Newton's proven discovery - the proven extrapolation of the same force that causes relatively minuscule apples to fall, also causing the orbiting of the relatively enormous planets.

 

('The thump of a great apple in the stillness of a crisp October morn. Motivated only by the mere necessity of perfect ripeness.' - Hawthorne.)

 

Newton, finally acknowledged the conditional existence of gravity; only because his own newly invented calculus confirmed that, indeed the same force that motivationally generates falling apples, does likewise generate and sustain the orbits of planets. Yet, as we are about to be reminded, Newton took great care to point out that he did not know or purport to know the identity of gravity, and that his mathematical address to gravity is not concerned with or dependent upon its causal identity, or, its direction...

 

As we shall see, the popular term 'Newtonian concept of attraction (a pulling force)', as applied to gravity, was never unconditionally endorsed by Newton. The concept of gravity as 'a pulling force of attraction' remains a speculative though understandably popular term, coined by Newton's ben eficiaries. All of this is to say that the conceptualization of gravity as any sort of pulling force of attraction was not Newton's resolute conceptual or by any means exclusive definition of gravity. Allow the derivation of this last statement to be further qualified:

 

I wish to cite at this time what is to say the least, a most interesting alternative concept concerning the identity of (what Newton was always careful to call 'universal') gravity. An otherwise completely ignored statement which might even be correctly categorized as 'obscure', or 'inconsequential'. Were it not for the fact that this statement is made by Sir Isaac Newton. And, were it not for the fact that this statement is included in the very (3 page, non-mathematical) Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA.

 

From the beginning of the 1st to the end of the 2nd page of Newton's three page Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA, Newton is discussing the motions of falling objects and orbiting planets. By way of his applied mathematical descriptions of the effects of the force of gravity. At this time, Newton offers the following statement about what causes the gravitationally induced motions of planets & apples, quote:

 

“For I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they may all depend on certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards each other, and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of Nature in vain."

 

___I have added only the bolding in the quote of Newton. As Fuller talks about these subjects of Universe & metaphysics, I hope to find those pertinent refererences in Synergetics & juxtapose them here favorably & shortly.:)

[Turtle]

Software bug causing double post: delete post function not present in "go advanced".

[Turtle]

___Excuse the doubl-post effect; it's just a new software bug.

___Here is the Fuller material I mentioned; I have bolded the wording I find germain.

 

305.02 Universe is, inferentially, the biggest system. By starting with Universe, we automatically avoid leaving out any strategically critical variables. In the Universe, everything is always in motion and everything is always moving in the directions of least resistance. When we are dealing always in terms of a finite Universe or totality of behavior, we are able to work from the generalized whole to the particular or special-case manifestation of the generalized accounting. This is the basis of the grand philosophic accounting of quantum mechanics.

 

308.00 Universe is finite because it is the sum total of finitely furnished experiences. The comprehensive set of all experiences synergetically constituting Universe discloses an astronomically numbered variety of subset event-frequency rates and their respective rates of conceptual tunability comprehension. It takes entirely different lengths of time to remember to "look up" different names or facts of past events. Universe, like the dictionary, though integral, is ipso facto nonsimultaneously recollectable; therefore, as with the set of all the words in the dictionary, it is nonsimultaneously reviewable, ergo, is synergetically incomprehensible, as of any one moment, yet is progressively revealing.

 

Taken from:

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s03/p0000.html

[Turtle]

___Excuse the doubl-post effect; it's just a new software bug.:)

___Here is the Fuller material I mentioned; I have bolded the wording I find germain....

[That Rascal Puff]

Hello Scooter Upper Beamers:

 

:hihi:

 

If anyone - who's invited - at these coordinates can access delphi's TOTAL FIELD THEORY, among many other subjects on the menu at Kaiduorkhon's Forum (Ask Turtle, I think he, the dormouse and Alice, may know?), might you please let it be known here how that forum menu can be reached? So that others may click on to it. TOTAL FIELD THEORY is a work in progress and already more evolved as a condensed presentation of Gravity Is The 4th Dimension; particularly Part VII, which reveals an unprecedented, non-mathematical and comprehensive solution to the apparent contradiction of quantum mechanics 'versus' field theory. It's got to do with exponentiality of an accelerating spiral and the 90o dimensions that are generated by it, including a remarkably comprehensive explanation for the 'quantum leap' and photoelectric effect, the standing field of 4-Dimensions of 'static', 'non-expanding' matter, and the more ostensible transient electric and magnetic (electromagnetic) field of the energy moving at right angles out of 4-D mass 'particles' (electric charges without surfaces).

Would rully like to hear what 'Our gang', and anyone who's invited (this does not mean entry censoring intruders, who, by the way, are on a heck of a lot more radars than that of Yers Sincerely. Oh yah. GAHD and his reasons and plans are prone to remain horizontal to the floor. Soon. Very soon. There are a half dozen sectors of influence that this low ranking record alone is aware of, that are raising raising eyebrows regarding the new whirled and squeegee employed erasers displacing my posts. ('Chestnut brown canary, ruby throated sparrow; walkin the staight and narrow' etceteras, CrosBB, Bootleg & Trash, :hihi: paraphrased. The best is yet to come <If dogs run free?>...)

 

Keep those cards 'n letters coming in y'all. McCutcheon's bread 'n butter is being baked and churned at Delta Dawn's place, somewhere's in his renowned (near $30.00 - Scientology formatted) - mansion in the sky, and GAHD is on the precipice of gettin' sum arithmetical and plane geometric religion. :hihi: Si.

Carry on. Love is coming to us all.

- Poof :shrug:

[That Rascal Puff]

Dear Reader(s) and certainly Mr. orbsycli (Sp?):

 

:rolleyes:

 

You - plural - are prioritized here because this thread was originated by Turtle, in what I can only describe as a completely humbling gesture toward my work, and myself - ‘Walking Stick and Turtle Discuss Total Field Theory’ (The thread that Dear Reader is presently reading). That is: I am the humbled one, for whom this thread was established, by a man (and several of his compatriots) I’ve not met personally, who, in a matter of approximately the past month, has restored and elevated my faith in human beings in general. What follows is a mixture of self explicit issues - some specific, others more generalized.

I am assured by several seasoned Hypography forumites that the commencement of a thread, in the Hypography ‘Lounge’, rather than in mainstream Hypography threads, is, for several reasons, a better way for Yours Truly to express himself, and certainly, to receive and consider the expressions of others. The advise I was privileged to receive explained that more allowance is made for extended threads, here, in the ‘Lounge’. Allowing this record (T.R. Puff, Aka K.B.Robertson, etceteras) more latitude, with regard to what has been referred to as ‘extreeeemely lengthy posts’ (paraphrased). I am relatively new to the internet and all of its many facets, and am learning by way of my mistakes, and, those of others.

There are a few questions to be posted here, preceding some answers, requests, speculations and (‘off topic’) statements . . . .

 

([SIZE="1"]ob[/size]viously matter is not expanding).

 

First, some particular questions, respectfully addressed to orbsycli:

As you may recall, sir. Perhaps less than 48 hours ago (present time actual, 10 January 06, Tuesday, 1809 hrs., EST, U.S.A.), I commenced a thread here in Hypography’s ‘Lounge’. I initially entitled it ‘TOTAL FIELD THEORY’, as may be observed, ut supra; in situ. A short time later you responded, with a reminder that a thread entitled ‘TOTAL FIELD THEORY’, was already underway, here in the Lounge threads, and, as I understand your missive, that you were of a mind to obliterate my work here, with ‘glee, by fire. Amidst.’

 

I’m new to everything about the internet and www procedures, formats, formalities, familiarities; etceteras, so, I request your patience with me, in the event that there’s something to be understood here unbeknownst to myself, that finds me in equivocation, due to my own ignorance. Whereas, as I understand it, from looking through what is presently the three segments of entrys, listing threads presently extant and ongoing in the Hypography Lounge (We are Here & Now X), in lieu of correction, as I presently understand it, there are two - now three - threads including the title, ‘Total Field Theory’, posted here in the Lounge. That which was commenced by the Noble Thelonious Turtle (aegis of the Great Continental EuroAsian Green Grass RiverDragon); entitled ‘Walking Stick and Turtle Discuss Total Field Theory’, which began a matter of weeks ago (distinguished by GAHD’s exclusions of That Rascal Puff’s entries, as he participated in dialogue passing between Infamous, Turtle and himself; because ‘TRP is unworthy of google’, paraphrased.).

 

Followed by the thread entitled -TOTAL FIELD THEORY - commenced by this record, as of 8 January 05, the day before yesterday (El dia antes ayer). Followed by your entry, which states that my latest entry is preceded by Turtle’s entry, the afore quote ( - Walking Stick & Turtle Discuss Total Field Theory). In deference to your correction, I yielded to your stated authority (something about how you’re a kind of bartender, and that, if I don’t conform to your purported standards of titular precedence, you will gleefully immolate my work - words to that effect. Fairly admonishing that you were altogether prepared to do what GAHD has already done, a number of times, regarding my work, in the thread commenced by Turtle, entitled ‘Walking Stick and Turtle Discuss Total Field Theory). I fairly and promptly agreed to change the title of my alleged imposing title (TOTAL FIELD THEORY), to ‘Alternative Total Field Theory’. Adding up to what is apparently three different discussions on the same subject...

 

(Though arithmetic and related mathematical skills are not my forte - please correct me if I’m wrong - I think that’s right... Sort of reminiscent of the recently offered motives for Qfwfq & associates - temporarily banning ‘TRP’ - me - from all Hypography Website contingencies at large, for: “Multiple postings”, “Offensive content”, and “Reason: None”.

 

(Doesn't that just about cover everything? And, after all, isn't covering up Kent Benjamin Robertson's work for the past 45+ years, the big idea, after all?)

 

The possibility of hidden and secreted motives for my abrupt banning - for what was scheduled to be from 10 December 05, to 10 March 06 - was not issued. I may only be grateful that, apparently, cooler heads within the much revered Hypography Upper Administration <outside your circles of power?> prevailed; when & whereupon the three month declared ban was consequently lifted, a few days after Qfwfq fractiously imposed it, 10 December 05. )

 

QUESTION:

Is there some other entry entitled TOTAL FIELD THEORY, here in this three tiered section of Hypography’s Lounge, of which I am unaware? If so, please, kind sir. Clarify what is then, my present misunderstanding (the count & the amount?) about what has transpired, as described above. (We are insuperably prepared to garnish endless pardons?)

Is there another listing of thread titles germane to this issue, unknown to me? A reservoir of thread titles applicable to this communication?

Until better informed by yourself, or perhaps one of your many spokespersons, it is my understanding that the thread you refer to as preceding mine, is the Noble Thelonious Turtle’s humbling thread-dedication (a discussion of ‘Total Field Theory’) to Truly Yours (‘Walking Stick’ - a Scot sobriquet that Turtle will probably be happy to explain to you and/or yours, however many of the plurality of you there may happen to be <after 45+ years?> ).

 

On the other hand, in lieu of your clarification of what may very well be attributable to some fault, equivocaton and/or faux pax on my part, please accept my gratitude and debt to you (and yours?), for having reminded me of a more ‘on-topic’ (perhaps more captivating?) issue, regarding Total Field Theory, which relates directly to a multiplicity of additional operands. That is (please, always be quick to correct me whenever I am wrong?), your posted statement, here on this thread originated by Turtle, in my honor:

 

“sorry to but in, I’ll but right out

but love will never come to you

you will never find it if you go looking, either

its just something you stumble upon.

Carry on, gentlemen”.

- orbsycli (Sp?)

 

I think, in your double usage of the word ‘but’, that you probably mean ‘butt(s)’. If that is in fact your intended meaning, I’ll consider taking your (Double bit ‘never’) apology up with the (impossible) panel in my (displaced, love is wherever it emerges) coordinates and within my (unwriteable) parameters (You might fire off a few rounds of double-shot 150 proof <TripleSec?> inquiry to Crosby, Stills & Nash, regarding ‘Love is coming to us all’. They don’t specify whether it’s something that’s going to happen in the future, or, whether it’s an already arrived - coming and ongoing - process of love’s consummation of it’s destination?)

 

Aside from the above (philosophically tentative?) concerns, what we - my constructively united multiple personalities, and a modest number of friends and lovers (especialmente mi esposa y ninos, y las ninos de ellos?) - thank you for, is, in your impositionally employed misspelling of the word ‘but’: you have indeed reminded this record of a graphic pattern - geometric example - of what is directly cogent to TOTAL FIELD THEORY. That being (Epsilon), what empowers a Rocky Mountain ranging ram, for example, to butt adversarial and/or competitive elements. Namely the horns of a ram.

 

More specifically, the structure and geometrical shape of a ram’s horn (Such as might be sculpturally and metalurgically exampled on the frontal portion of the hood of a DODGE Ram (Tough - ‘The rules have changed’) truck, for example. Not unlike those improvised to effect hot air activated long range signals for tactical purposes of war, peace and love (sometimes related to textbook cold sweats and nightmares?); of Biblical renown, relative to the Old & New Religious Testaments.

 

Should you care to proffer aural sensory vigilance to a visual-typographical as well as *phonic signal series (*when read, incantationally recited - or melifluously sung - aloud) - improvising the issue of the marvelously timely, exemplary spatial structure and geometrically thought provoking shape of a ram’s horn (and like structures & geometric icons): please be comfortable and perhaps stand up or lie down for a stretch, maybe trot up the aisle or around the corners of your domicile, for some gourmet or Native American innovated popcorn, while the inspirational issue initiated by yourself, is transformed into a more cognate discussion about total field theory (Also suitable for discussions on ‘infinity’ and many other, sometimes unexpectedly related capital issues, most of which ancillaries appear in various locations all over the realm of Hypography Science Forums ?).

 

Your superlative leadership (here and at so many other locations - far beyond the ken of Locke, Hume or Kierkagaard?) may never be adequately rewarded for likewise inspiring the same issue, as it also swimmingly applies to other Olympic championship quality, world-class threads, right here in the more liberating, less format-intensive Hypography Lounge. (You - and yours, Sir - may have flash pointed the entire world wide web and internet up to and beyond ignition temperature and/or critical mass; the is experiencing difficulty in recalling a more masterfully manipulated key to compromising anywhere near this many - clearly labeled: ‘Don’t open this’ - air tights of whoopaz. Sir. (Refer, linear accelerators

 

Example: Tormod’s thread on ‘Infinity’ (‘Infinities’); which includes the distinguished participation of Resident Slayer, Buffy, Turtle (who wants for no introduction?) and a host of other Hypography-cast stellar illuminations (n’ stardust?).

The genuflecting record is furthermore moved to extoll the foregoing inspirational information at several other threads; in salutation of orbsycli’s incalculably rich contribution to the realm over which he so inimitably prevails as the incomparably dominant and propitious paradigm. Although it may be unlikely that orsycli will ever want for advise or information from anyone else (with the possible exception of GAHD?); the record humbly suggests that on any such unlikely occasion, Mr. Orbsycli consult Resident Slayer Buffy, who knows enough to know that whatever she may not know can be learned from Turtle, Tormod, Irish Eyes or Infamous (Not necessarily in that order; who know more than they know they know and where to find out? Like, the near future findings of Harvard’s Professor Lisa Randall, who is scheduled to join some of her peers at the world’s most powerful ‘particle’ accelerator in Geneva, Switzerland, sometime in 2007 AD; where, word is from Buffy, Turtle, Tormod, Irish Eyes and Infamous, that any number of formerly unidentified - as many as 10 or more dimensions of physical reality may be found, recognized and identified, when she and a very few others commence efforts to disassemble protons with the sceptre of 7 trillion volts...

 

This record looks forward to these forthcoming possibilities; advising Professor Randall only in the matter of modification regarding her perspective of gravity as a ‘weak force’; progressing to recognized microcosmic strong forces as manifestations of universal gravitation at relatively earlier moments of the A B C progressing 4-D space time continuum < Imagine that. How they do carry on in their humdrum, extreeeemely extended posts?> In summary for this heirarchy of multi-momentous ensemble of systematic space-time coordinates, this record is compelled to agree furthermore with orbsycli about stumbling into love; since in fact this bewitched, beguiled and bewildered Albert Apprentice did just exactly that with regard to what became Einstein’s Presently Abandoned Unified Field, reinstated, w’out Mathematics).

 

Accordingly, by your leave, Sir orbsycli (Have we met in the Past <Moment A>, besides the Present <Moment B> somewhere else, before? Might destiny have it that we are somehow slated to meet yet once again in the Future <Moment C>? <Come 'n getcher red hotts.>)...

 

Please allow an Intermission at this point, that someone else may have something to say, before the momentarily restive panel rallies for yet another tribute to your prosaic allowance to ‘carry on gentlemen’.

(No women allowed? <What ever happened to Ashura?> Whose thread is this, anyway?) ((Just axing?)) (((‘Schwing!’?)))

 

[“Nothing is more dangerous than an idea when it’s the only one we have; particularly when it originated with someone else.” - Alain-Robertson[/b][/b]

 

:)

 

- Poof