Walking Stick & The Turtle discuss Total Field Theory

[Buffy]

(Incidentally. We here at Alpha Beta Chi Sorority do not cotton to self deprecation by so called small brained blonds. We refer you to Irish Eyes, Turtle, Ifmy or Tormod - or any of their improved halves, for a full regimen of rehabilitation. Prego.)

Mr. Dragon,

 

What is is not always what appears to be! I will not assume that you like to keep your wimminfolk barefut and with child! Rehabilitation is for apostates and I suffer none. My cohorts here will attest to my intentions and wiles. Forsooth, they art mine compadres in arms (and some of us like me 'n Irish carry *big* weapons of mass destruction, as Amazons are wont to do [happiness is a warm 1911]), and I will stand forthrightly in their awe-inspiring midst. I refer you to them for verifacsimilication.

 

As with all dangerous substances, the warning labels (as in this case shown in the pithy signature below) should be heeded with all due alacrity lest darkness fall (as you would so properly and profoundly say Mr. deCamp).

I saw the lion he was standing alone with a tadpole in a jar. Copyright © 1973 Superhype Publishing

 

Harmoniously copacetic,

Madame Buffy

[infamous]

To all concerned: I can appreciate that some of us feel they have been insulted, and I must say, with some reasonable evidence. But I fear that this thread will perish if we all don't try and keep our comments directed at the purpose of the thread. I can understand Buffy, why you have taken exception to Puff's comments, and I wish he would leave such comments well enough alone. It may also be, that Puff took former comments as veiled insults and felt the need to retaliate. I just wish everyone involved would just quit and try to contribute constructive additions to this thread instead of competing verbally...............Infy

[That Rascal Puff]

:lol:

Dearest Campers:

Be at ease that for my part, and I do rully believe, for that of the Resident Slayer and Infmy Steadfast (who is after all, a peacekeeper), there is no hazard known here lately of anyone feeling insulted. Not lately (Not since I told the discreet InfmyStdfst to jump in the nearest lake and broadsided him again, while he was simply trying to get along, when neither of us knew enough about the other...?)

When Buffy signed in this record was upgraded and elated. It was clearly a complimentary Lampoon. Mountain Flower. (We've been called a lotta things in our day, but that was the summit of all cheers?) As I certainly intended my response to be. Then there's the gold rush guy with the shovel planting mountain flower seeds.

An'en we get to witness another Resident Slayer autograph in the warmth of an abbreviation for a 1911 vintage 1911 A-1, cooly referred to only as a '1911'. (She didn't say a word more that goes with that date, like, 7 rounds of 250 grain Geneva Convention jacketed rounds in the magazine, with #8 optionally homed in the chamber; or a web belt with two more magazines and a snap down holster and three canteens. But in one fell swoop of a four digit number you just know she knows... Si.) Then a close-out with the first time we've seen copecetic properly spelled since we found it in a dictionary about 55 years ago... (Did we just spell it right? Anyway Buffy did. Demurely sheathed Damascus steel quality keen retractile claws worthy of respectfully rendered applause? Just flashing her Sorority sign for Molly Good Golly?)

 

Mr. Infmy. (Hoping you don't misunderstand if we say 'yer cute', sometimes?) It may be that yer overly concerned with a falling out between or amongst the only recently formed team coordination and indoctrination.

It's good to know yer concerned, Infmy, really. But I think it's some sort of a loosely defined - if guarded - bonding ritual; somebody please correct 'Mr. Dragon' if he's astray in this tentative dismay. Dear Sir Mr. Infmy, the harpoon on rehab was a lark. Honest. (Ask Turtle to get a confirmation from Buffy, IrisEyes, Oslo, or Arguably The Most? <Where in the heck is that guy, ever since his vibrant, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo n' violet walk-through cameo, anyway...? <Hey Craig: say 'arguably the most, if not formal', if yer there?> We'll rustle up a compliment whenever possible?)

 

'Foorsooth with all due alacrity for verifacsimilication?'

Hey, Steadfast, where, after all, is yer hyperbolic sense of hubris...?

 

Murphy's 5th Law of Combat is:

'Don't share a fighting trench with anyone braver than you, cuz they'll only get you both killed'.

(On the other hand, we're aweful grateful she's in our regiment?)

.................

Still gathering data for augmentation of the TOTAL FIELD THEORY work in progress at delphiforums; where it seems I can transfer illustrations that don't paste in this thread format. Good to know yer so sensitive about the maintenance of this thread, Mr. Alias. I can't speak fer sure for anyone else here, but in dimensions of hot n' cold, young and old, there's a heck of a lot more ticker tape to be chronographed out here.

Thank you (Velly much?),

Madame FlutterBye and,

Mr. LuffaBeau?

((Ain't the meandering Love River of Life currently grand?))

(Fish are jumpin', and the cotten is unseasonably high?)

 

(((If any of you die on us, we'll kill ya?)))

:lol:

- Foops

:lol:

[infamous]

:P

 

 

Mr. Infmy. (Hoping you don't misunderstand if we say 'yer cute', sometimes?) It may be that yer overly concerned with a falling out between or amongst the only recently formed team coordination and indoctrination.

It's good to know yer concerned, Infmy, really. But I think it's some sort of a loosely defined - if guarded - bonding ritual; somebody please correct 'Mr. Dragon' if he's astray in this tentative dismay. Dear Sir Mr. Infmy, the harpoon on rehab was a lark. Honest.

:P

- Foops

:lol:

Remembering that I'm only a novice with respect to my understanding of the physical universe, I fear that I may understand those things much better than I do human relations. Please accept my apologies if I have misconstrued anyones intentions. While I've spent many hours studying physical science, thru my neglect of human associations, I may have become a social idiot...........................Infy

[That Rascal Puff]

Remembering that I'm only a novice with respect to my understanding of the physical universe, I fear that I may understand those things much better than I do human relations. Please accept my apologies if I have misconstrued anyones intentions. While I've spent many hours studying physical science, thru my neglect of human associations, I may have become a social idiot...........................Infy

________________

 

:messenger

Speaking of pyrotechnically projected projectile throwers without departing from the central forebearance of gravity: when a high velocity projectile (as compared to that of a 1911 A-1, which is relatively slow, at 900 fps; is accomodated not only by the gas operated semi-auto handgun with more safety mechanisms than any other; but is also the same .45 cal. projectile and casing accomodated by Thompson sub-machine rifle) is fired horizontal and parallel to the earth's (relatively uncurving) surface, while a missile of the same size, density and mass value is dropped vertically from the same height as the flat trajectory fired projectile: they both descend at the same rate of acceleration. One traveling the distance between where it's released to free fall above and contact the earth's surface, the other traveling - depending on its velocity - for hundreds of yards if not several miles. The faster the fired projectile the 'flatter' its trajectory. The same thing happens to a flashlight, for example, when it's beam is energized horizontal to the earth's surface and the flashlight itself with casing and batteries is simultaneously released above the earth's surface from the height at which it was turned on to throw a given beam of light. That is, the casing and batteries consituting the flashlight proper, and the beam of light that was projected from it at the moment of the flashlight mechanism's release above the earth's surface: both beam and casing descend at exactly the same rate of acceleration.

 

Review: in the case of a pyrotechnically fired projectile from a pistol or long gun, the horizontally traveling missile and the missile thrower released at the moment it's fired - each descend at the same rate and strike the ground at the same time. The released free falling rifle or hand gun falling vertically, say, a matter of a few feet, while it's horizontally projected high velocity missile may move hundreds of yards or several miles; while both firearm and projected missile descend at the same rate and strike the ground at the same time.

In the exampled circumstance of flashlight and the beam it throws, the only reason the beam does not appear to descend and instead does in fact proceed through the earth's atmosphere and into deep space, is due to the extreme velocity of a given light beam - which is measured to descend, however slightly before it escapes the coordinate system earth, at the same rate of any other free falling test object. According to Newton's laws, descending objects or entities of more mass should fall correspondingly faster; and they don't. Because 'the curvature of space-time' is the omnidirectional acceleration of the earth along with all else physical; including light; albeit that the latter physical entity - in this case, horizontally projected light - is much less massive, it still carries mass value.

 

Note that, with the exception of some laser beams, the 'light frontal' of any given projection of light ( say, you turn a flashlight on and off for a thousandth, or a hundredth or a half of a second) this unit of light beam has a beginning and end, and the frontal portion is increasing in width - fanning out - very much as the considered pie chart of a 90o portion of a 360o 'charge'/'particle'. As long as it isn't obstructed by anything in it's journey through space, this segment of light beam continues to move not only in a linear path, but also continues to increase in its width, at all points of it's width, with the frontal - earliest - portion of light increasing its width moreso than the aftermost portion - ending - of the same considered segment of lightbeam.

QUESTION:

Is the width-growth of such a light beam comparable to some other dynamic in nature? The beam en toto is distributing itself ever thinner in the law of the inverse square, and this transverse distribution is moving at right angles to the linear direction of the projected, henceforth transcient beam...

 

Is there a calculable relationship between the rate of increasing width of such a beam, with some other dynamic, in nature? Is it related to the so called 'universal rate of descent', for example?

I haven't the answer to this question, but wished to post the question on this thread's bulletin board, that other's may ponder and possibly resolve it...

 

(Incidentally, in consideration of objects in free fall above the earth's surface, any given object in vertical - such as a high altitude low opening <HALO> parachutist's - descent, will continue to accelerate; while keeping in mind what is called 'terminal velocity' - this is approximately 120 mph and the point at which air resistance prevents a given object in descent from continuing to accelerate ever faster. Whereas the acceleration prevails 'in the absence of air resistance'

This same principle is not infrequently misunderstood to contradict the prevailing - ever increasing, acclerating - descent rate of free falling objects, in the awry reasoning that, if gravity is the 4th dimension (if all of the physical universe is expanding ever-faster), 'how does an airplane - or a bird or bumblebee - fly'.

 

Of course the answer is that all aerodynamic principles that enable flight are not only 'as applicable', but have been in fact prevailing under the previously unrecognized, incumbent 4-D circumstances.

Einstein's 'acknowledged' 4-D universe doesn't displace, but rather fulfills, the existing realities. All prevailing conditions inevitably remain 'as is' (in situ); the only change being in the sentient recognition of prevalent conditions that were previously unrecognized.

So far as may be anticipated, the 4, 5 & 6 (+) dimensional issue at hand is not only a revolution in physical science, it is also several varieties of revolution in the sciences at large; including disciplines such as architecture and the fine arts - human consciousness itself; as well as an expose of what amounts to a modern day inquisition (by methodological banishment; exclusion from mainstream communication, in 'the age of instant communication').

 

A lot of mistakes on the part of 'the physical science community' <doesn't exist, but it's a frequently brandished term> are revealed, along with no small number of 'reality hi-jackings and conceptual filibusters', by any other name. The big bang theory is at the forefront of such considered, enormous social equivocations. The big bang 'theory', for example, does not qualify as a theory, and, is a very poor hypothesis; found repeatedly untenable, even without the fact of the 4-D space time continuum revelation that the back tracked point of 'intersection' must represent a location in space where all of the matter of the universe intersected. In 4-Dimensions, the 3-D 'ending intersection' does not ('inevitably') occur. It simply gets ever-smaller - MOment A, in the 4-D space-time continuum A < B < C < ; forever. Re: 'steady state theory (reinstatement of).

 

This 4-D key also reveals the nature and meaning of 'non-absolute space' and - an accompanying - 'non-absolute time'. Black holes (singularities) are also accomodated in this same '4-D mass field' consideration, as is Lorentz contraction, and the standard which allows the recognition of the 5th & 6th dimensions of electricity & magnetism, as well as a more clear understanding of what is meant in the axiom of Special Relativity, finding that the velocity of light is constant, relative to the source from which it originates.

 

With regard to Sir Alias' Infamous 'resistance', and 'drag', he may be correctly anticipating 'negative inertia', which, colloquially speaking, amounts to a resistance to change, and, since Heraclitus observed that 'nothing is permanent except change', there may be what Sir AliasInfmy foresees as 'lag'. Does that imply anything you're contemplating, Infmy? Since, in the proposed setting, acceleration is the dominant paradigm, it certainly follows that it may be constantly accompanied by inertial resistance to change from the state - accomodated by calculus - it 'was', in, to the state it 'is' in, to the state it's 'going to be' in...(squared).

 

For those who've read and contemplated Gravity Is The 4th Dimension (TOTAL FIELD THEORY, EXTRATERRESTRIAL PHYSICS 101), surely you realize that I'm far from knowing all the answers; have not by any means, explained everything. Whereas, a so called 'theory of everything' has the potential of being carried completely out to apply to explaining what are alternately called 'the four universal forces', AKA, 'the unified field' - accounting for microcosmic strong forces, macrocosmic weak forces, gravity and electromagnetism.

There is another way - with more factors to condense into one explanation, for looking at this issue of 'everything theory' (Not to be confused with 'The Final Theory'; which - until further notice - is a triple oxymoronic nonsequitur: in three words <No mean triad of feats?> 'Everything' suggesting the potential inclusion of ingredients for a solution to all theories; 'Final', suggesting there's no room for evolutionary improvement or the inclusion of previously unrecognized dynamics and/or entitities.

 

On this thoughtful note, this record politely suggests that the recently barnstorming Mark McCutcheon is a kindred spirit with Ron Hubbard's SCIENTOLOGY. It seems, Mr. McCutcheon's 'expansion on an atomic level' theory, is an uprooted divot from a lush green 4-D fairway of tee-offs that he may only add footnotes to, were he to take the axiomatic theme of K. B. Robertson's work, the way K. B. Robertson has allowed such - 'matter is an accerating 4-D field' - to lead him (KBR, TRP, etc.).

 

Instead, Mr. McCutcheon and his sacred bovine worshipping followers ruminate as though having reinvented Benjamin Franklin's kite, key and electricity, overpowered Ampere, Ohm & Volta, fooled Faraday, ousted Olber, Hoodwinked Hertz, blitzed Boltzmann, pan-caked Planck, decimated Dirac, exculpated Einstein, bisected Born & Bohr, circumferentially out paced Schwartzchild, shorn Schroedinger, etceteras, and, having found a hard copy publisher, apparently out to fleece whomever freely accesses the offered 1st Chapter - then must go on to money order the book to learn what Mr. McCutcheon (and THE PUBLISHER'S CLEARING HOUSE?) has to say in the way of where he goes from where he started (High tea with Ed McMahon & Dik Clarke?).

 

(As for That Rascal Puff and his personae :P : We're waiting 'til they make a film of the book <Narrated by Donald Trump?>, and then, eventually, go on to premiere it on TV <Alongside Stephan Hawking's Universe?>).

 

Where Mr. McCutcheon is coming from is otherwise known as what he calls 'expansion at the atomic level'. From what this record has learned of what he does with it, includes what he - McCutcheon - doesn't do with it. Apparently including a painfully noteworthy aversion from the series of unavoidable conclusions anyone encounters when guided by a concept of ever increasing 'expansion at the atomic level'.

 

Were Mr. McCutcheon to follow the 4-D dotted lines emerging from his 'discovery', he would find himself with his thumb in the tractor trailer exhausted breeze on Hwy 101 (There's a lotta people who're familiar with that <No Exit> route).

Instead, McCutcheon seeks more untraveled sanctuary in the statistical realm of the microcosms (When in doubt, cite foamy Danish waveicle smash n' grab entanglement spun-out 'w collapsation in the hypothetically saturated anarchistic netherrealm of charmingly normalized strangeness <and yo Mama?>)

 

Perhaps the 38 year old, 2003 internet published Mr. McCutcheon did not glean his central inspiration from the ground work and foundations of K. B. Robertson; whereas, the former certainly does fulfill a role model of those who've engaged and refined 'THE ART OF MISSING THE (while making a) POINT: When You Can't Afford To Catch On.

 

In this case, without so much as a squeaking out an iota of acknowledgement of this record's work, which was published and distributed in what is now ten small press produced essays and books, commencing 44 years before Mr. McCutcheon's THE FINAL THEORY was published, according to its author, five years after he first thought of it (1998). That's a year before Gravity Is The 4th Dimension was published on the internet (12/'99) and simultaneously made freely accessible to any cyber-surfer who learned of and cared to study it.

 

It's none of this record's business if McCutcheon and his publisher's choose to offer the public the beginning chapter via the internet, then going on to inform such readers that if they wish to access the entire book, they may buy it, at just under $30.00; with those who have done so, in discussions about it on the net, notably refusing to reveal key information they've learned from the book, 'because it's the author's bread and butter'. This record supposes it's all a matter of whatever most nutrifies a given ink slinger. (Inspiration, perspiration, aspiration, philanthropically inspired communication and/or guarded plagiarization?)

 

"A best seller was a book which somehow sold well, just because it was selling well." - Seymour Boorstein

 

As the original non-mathematical translator of Einstein's most reknowned works; speaking for myself, as a number of sponsors, may offer testimony, including Dr. John Shaw of UCSC Berkeley, Richard Jonish Benish, of Milwaukee Wisconsin, Gary Arlington and Seth Russel of San Francisco, Prof. Gregory Nageotte of Santa Barbara, and Prof. Mark Stephan Halfon, of New York's Nassau University, I gifted, gratis, nearly as many books as the above sponsors were generously happy to finance, with regard to re-printing, publishing, distributing and selling out previously sold-out editions.

 

Wild horses could not have stopped me from freely distributing - for purposes of sharing and enjoying inevitable contributions to and improvements of - the (until if and when disqualified: major revolutionary) work I inherited from Einstein and a long list of Searchers from whom he inherited the capacity to do his unprecedented work (as goes the entire history of the evolution of physical science, and so many other academic and social disciplines): myself being the first person of any known record, to non-mathematically translate same, beginning in 1959, over 29 years before M. McCutcheon was born, and 40+ years before Mr. McClutcheon proclaims he even thought of it.

 

Non-mathematical translation of Einstein's Special, General and reinstatement of the presently abandoned Unified Field theory is an achievment which was officially and professionally declared 'impossible' (A Final Evaluation?), until (with a lot of help from many other named and un named persons from all walks of life) K. B. Robertson abundantly proved - documented - otherwise.

(It's in the condensed book: refer, http://einstein.periphery.cc/ , and, TOTAL FIELD THEORY - KaiduOrkhon's Forums, at Delphiforums.)

 

Whoever may consider some of the above statements inflationary or incredible... Allow this author to say what he considers incredibly inflationary:

 

It's not at all believable that Mr. McCutcheon, or any one of a recently erupted rash of 'revisionary' hobbyists, 'exanding ever faster at the atomic level', were inspired to do their 'gravity is just inertia, or is it the 4th dimension' scalping - without ever having been influenced by ten editions of a sold out small press production, internationally distributed in a series of hard copy essays and books (in at least four languages) since 1959; then published on the internet in 1999). Not counting 1971 vintaged titular graffitti ('Gravity Is The 4th Dimension') on the subway walls of New York City and the Science Buildings of UCLA, UC Santa Barbara, UC Isla Vista, the Birge - physics - Building at University of California, Berkeley, and all over San Francisco and Los Angeles. ('EYE never heard of it'. Oke...)

 

It is an internet archived historical fact that as of 1998 (A year before it was posted for all to access on the internet), when the term 'Gravity Is The 4th Dimension' was entered in Google, there was no corresponding listing or discussion on that subject, whatsoever.

There was a short list of discussions on dimensions, none of them having anything to do with physical science.

Whereas, since then, there's a storm of discussions on 'the 4th, 5th and 6th dimensions' on the net, most of which do not so much as mention this author,and, when they do, it's a gesture of demonisation: since one Brian Kirk Parquette's 1998 dated, push-pinning campaign and foredoomed effort to pass himself off as - and profanely impersonate - the author of the work he volunteered to post for K. B. Robertson (after the former aggressively introduced himself to the latter - later telling people, on and off the internet, that he planned to 'steal' K.B. Robertson's work, six years prior, when 'BKparque - 'ver7ein' - lived in Sacramento <He or anyone else, may as well 'steal' the oceans of the world and deep space. Bienvenidido al realidad.. :lol: >).

 

Whoever may be of a mind to cooly pacify this record's concern about the history of his work; what is described above as having occurred 'so long ago', is reminded that the very recent - failed - attempts (12.10.05) to ban this record from Hypography Science Forums...

 

('Reason: offensive post'. - Qfwfq. 'Reason: Multiple posting', 'Reason: None', 'Reason: 'That Rascal Puff is unworthy of google' - GAHD). ...

 

are directly related to the described history, preceding these (characteristically anonymous) 'Hey All' hailing, 'meds', 'doctor' and Chinaman' vocabularizing, icon inoculating, pestophile 'party poopers' ('are back'). Whereas: For the first time in their three generational waves of pariah purveying, anathema anabolising campaign to effect the general vilification and general banishment of K. B. Robertson, the cited antagonists managed only to get themselves openly reprimanded, if not banished altogether.

 

For further information on the culminating joss (refer 'karma') of these self revealed, neighborhood and internet infesting socio-political and scientific parasites, refer: The Robertson Family Conspiracy, under that title, on the menu at Kaiduorkhon's Forums, delphiforums, and, The Invisible 1984 Machine: Robertson Family Conspiracy, http://einstein.periphery/machine_1 thru _4, a faction story about which the readers may draw their own Hollywood Guild challenged conclusions.

 

"Standing Wave: Stationary wave. A wave produced by the simultaneous transmission of two similar wave motions in opposite directions. In acoustics, standing waves are caused by interference between waves of the same frequency in such a way that the combined intensity varies between maxima and minima over the region of interference." - Penguin Dictionary of Science, by E. B. Uvarov and D.R. Chapman.

 

(*A standing wave of electromagentism or mechanical vibrations of the air is also a four dimensionally expanding field that, like matter, is generally not recognized as four dimensionally expanding. - KBR)

 

"Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the men of old.

Seek what they sought." - Atsuo Basho

 

"Just as philosophy is the study of other people's misconceptions, so history is the study of other people's mistakes." - Phillip Gedalla

 

"Jealousy is all the fun you think they had." - Erica Jong

 

"An egotist talks about himself."

"A gossip talks about other people".

"A free soul talks about ideas." - Anon

 

"God cannot alter the past. But historians can." - Samuel Butler

 

"I love being a writer. What I can't stand is the paper work." - Anon.

 

:lol:

 

- :lol:

[That Rascal Puff]

A FORMERLY PRIVATE (on the Q.T.) PINK ORB WINKING MESSAGE FROM Mr. Splendid To Behold...

 

TITLE:

"man, why do you need to insult? it's childish."

T.R.P. I would suggest you read http://hypography.com/forums/?page=rules .

 

**********

(This record went to, read and copied what is retrieved at the provided URL. GAHD would do well to tattoo the suggestions and rules on his fantail:)

 

Hypography Science Forums - Site Rules

These rules must be observed by anyone who wants to participate in our community.

 

Why do we require registration before I can post?

We want everybody to feel welcome, and we want to make these forums a community which is open to all. We do not want anonymous flamings and rants. If you plan to post messages for which you do not want to be responsible - well, these are the wrong forums for you.

 

You should register because we want to know who you are, and because you get to post, edit, subscribe and post private messages.

 

What kinds of topics are discussed here?

This is a forum for discussing science and technology. Basically, we welcome anything that falls within these realms. We like to consider ourselves open minded, but we do not like to see commercials, arrogant comments, or flames.

 

How should I behave?

Be yourself. But please respect these ground rules:

 

If you make strange claims, please provide proof or at least backup of some kind. If you fail to do so, or the backup you provide is not deemed adequate, the moderators may move your post to the Strange Claims forum.

 

If you want to refute someone's claims, please stay calm and point out where you think they went wrong, and what kind of proof you base your own opinion on.

Do not post links to other sites as proof of your claims without commenting what the relevant sites say and why they are important to the current discussion.

Statements like "I just know that this is the way it is" (especially when religion is being discussed) are considered ignorant and might be deleted.

If you ask for opinions, respect the replies you get.

It is generally a good idea not to spend all your time in only a few topics.

 

Do not endlessly show us that *your* theory is the *only* truth. And don't follow this up by making people look stupid for pointing out that there are other answers, especially if they provide links and resources. It will get you banned!

 

Also, we will not accept racist, sexist, hateful, or derogatory posts. Such posts may be deleted or edited without further notice. Violations of these ground rules might lead to banning without further notice. It is always a good idea to lurk around a bit before you start posting.

 

How do I avoid having my posts edited/deleted?

Try to stay on topic. Lurk around a bit before you start posting. It is generally a good idea to search the forums to see if what you want to discuss has been discussed before.

 

Avoid short, witty, off-topic remarks ("hit-and-run posts") in a thread where people are having a serious discussion. This is considered rude and offensive. Use the Watercooler forum for that kind of thing.

 

Also, rants, flames, arrogant posts, and hit-and-run posts might lead to temporary or permanent banning so please try to behave in here as you would in real life, and everyone will be happy.

 

Important: Never post PMs or e-mails from other users without asking their permissions first. PMs and e-mails are considered private communication and posting them is a violation of the other user's right to privacy. If you have received an offending PM or e-mail, send it to one of the admins. Posts containing PMs and e-mails can be deleted by the admins and might get you banned.

 

A word on copyright

You must not publish content which is copyrighted. It will be deleted and you might get banned. We might not even give you a warning before we delete it, as it is we who are responsible for the content that is posted on this site.

 

Read more about copyright here:

 

 

US Copyright Office - Copyright Law

US Copyright Office - Fair Use

Copyright myths

Typical reasons for banning

If you find yourself being banned, you most likely broke our rules above, or:

 

Posted SPAM or something we assumed to be SPAM

Annoyed our members so much that the moderators decided to ban you.

 

A ban is either temporary or permanent. A temporary ban will usually last for a week, after which it will automatically be lifted. A permanent ban is - well, permanent. Please follow our site rules - we really don't like to ban people.

 

Linking to other sites

Our policy on linking to other sites is pretty simple. Members may link to any other site that provides information that helps answer another member's question or is just of general interest to members of that particular forum. We do, however, encourage members to add these links to our link database for indexing and easier access out of context.

 

The only type of linking (besides porn, pyramid schemes, hateful sites, and spam, of course) that will not be allowed on our site is when members solicit people to leave our site and join a competing service. That's just common sense. We won't allow people to use our site to promote a competing service any more than a brick-and-mortar store would allow his competitor to paste flyers all over his walls.

 

However, observing these rules, members are always welcome to link to any online resource, whether it's on our site or any other site, in order to share useful information with fellow members.

 

Allowed usernames

We do not allow usernames that have domain names in them, or which imply that you are a moderator or admin. Foul language in usernames is also not accepted, and the moderators will delete accounts which break these rules.

 

Watch your spelling

It is generally a good idea to write clearly and edit out spelling mistakes. We encourage everyone to write as well as they can. For a lot of our users English is a second language and for them a misspelling may make your entire message unreadable. If you are among those who do not command English very well, please try to do your best.

 

Please also do not write all your text in one huge block. Hit the ENTER key now and then and leave some space between your paragraphs to make your posts easier to read.

 

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE POSTS IN CAPITAL LETTERS. This is the same as shouting and is considered rude (plus it is hard to read!). Such posts may be edited by the moderators.

 

What are the user levels?

The user levels are our way to give active users access to more features like PM storage, their own gallery etc. You can read more about that in our How to understand the user levels thread.

 

Respond to requests from Mods and Admins

The moderators and administrators put a lot of time and effort into maintaining this site. If we send you an "official" private message or an e-mail, in which we obviously want your reply, we require that you respond. Failure to respond in such cases may force us to close your account.

 

How do I avoid normal argument fallacies?

Take our advice: If you post theories which are untestable, ideas which are obviously based on bad logic, arguments which appeal to faith but fail when faced with reason, you will meet opposition in these forums. This is not because we are unfriendly. It is because we want to learn, try theories, understand, and most of all, discuss.

 

Therefore, it is a good idea to put these links on your reading list - in fact, we kindly ask you to really do so. You may learn something (we did). Thanks to Freethinker for providing the links.

 

(All links open in a new browser window)

 

Fallacies

http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies

 

Matteo Dell'Amico provides this feature in Italian

http://www.linux.it/~della/fallacies/index.html

 

Common Argument Fallacies

http://www.liberty.k12.mo.us/hs/WB/wh_caf.htm

 

Fallacies in arguments

http://www.ramdac.org/fallacies.php

 

Notes on logical fallacies, etc.

http://www.philosophy.eku.edu/Williams/HON102Web/falsec-web.htm

 

Fallacies: Mistakes in the Logic of Arguments

http://www.unc.edu/depts/wcweb/handouts/fallacies.htm

 

Composition Patterns: Developing an Argument

http://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/argument_logic.htm

 

Fallacious Arguments

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?FallaciousArguments

 

Fallacies

http://www.mathacademy.com/pr/prime/articles/fallac/

 

Logic & Fallacies

http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html

 

Have fun!

 

Most of all, these forums are here for people to meet, discuss, and learn. But we also want you to have fun. So rule #0 is: smile and be happy. Most likely people will smile and be happy back.

 

With regards,

The Hypography Science Forums admins and moderators

 

***********

GAHD's Private Message to K. B. Robertson, continued:

 

Specificlly the Sections labeled "How should I behave?" and "How do I avoid having my posts edited/deleted?, in relation to everything between "A word to the one-up-manship motivated..." to "...inherit a moment of leave or departure)." in post number 77 of this thread. I would appreciate it it you stop insulting the staff members.

 

of course, you could just ignore me secure in the idea that somehow my 'squeegee' isn't quite big enough, but I would not suggest that you do so.

 

thank you.

[/b]

 

*******************

"Behave as you would in real life"?

 

This Is 'Real Life', Mr. 'Juvenile Formatting' who deigns to publicly proclaim Kent Benjamin Robertson 'unworthy of google', while shirking from the import of the KBR/TRP posts you covetously obliterate. (You and yours have vigorously generated a rap sheet longer than Shaquille O'Niel's arms. And none of you, or yours, can escape it, or make it go away. With or without help from whatever Hypography staffers you may or not hold under your, megalomaniacal, God blasheming spell(s).

 

All of Hypography Walking Stick and other germane forums are archived for a work-in-progress documentary, created by yourself and all those of your inclinations; for which you and yours will be held accountable for everything you say and do (verbatim, rhyme, verse, bell, book and candle).

 

Not only on the net, in locations where you cannot intrude and obliterate, but also in hard copy; as a continuation - Part II - of the ongoing ROFACO, Robertson Family Conspiracy.

 

You apparently refer and protest to (a specific portion of) message #77 (does this sound familiar):

 

"And now this:

A word to the one-up-manship motivated, exhaustive gotcha' gonzo'leers (Venice, your Ordu stressed, desperate sanctuary taking az & other cheap shooitng pee sprayers who would impose upon, harass or threaten this esteemed thread - namely orbsycli - 'The universe is shaped like Jazz. Duh' ... 'Gleefully burn Einstein's historically overlooked, now translated work to the ground' - paraphrased <'bartender guy', is it... Oke.>),

C1ay,

Qfwfq,

Hard Science,

Cold creation

and a generally pillow case and rap-sheet raimanted, Lon Chaney impostering multitude of - shape changing; morality and rationality shirkers: KaiduOrkhon is not a vindictive persona, whereas, all of you - and a precisely inventoried stock of others like you - are video-audio taped before, during and after casting yourselve's into the yawning Hollywood Guild pit, into the Jaws of History (Re: Hotel HotFurnace - where U can check out at will, but never inherit a moment of leave or departure).

 

That is. Poof doesn't hold a grudge, whereas Mystic Horse and Keyboard MacColley invariably preclude all altitudes and invariably quantum leap to a higher place from which to pee upon any and all who attempt to place themselves above - or without the justice - of slipping the surley bonds of whatever coordinate system, reaching out, to touch the face of God.

 

(((The undeniably impressive massive plurality of U: have me now.)))

 

"Having listened to your imperatives, I have a question for you and all those of your stripe 'n plumage.

('What might that be?)...

"How are you gonna get back down that hill?"

- Paul Newman, *HOMBRE

(Re: Romance language entendre doble: squared)

(*Excerpt)

 

((We like some movies))

(Are you not entertained?)

 

Carry on. Love is incontrovertibly upon you.

(Sure as piddle from a higher place in unlimited outer space?)

((So good to be there?))

(((We've only just begun.)))

 

<Can U say 'Mangudai'? Can U spell it?>"._______________

 

Apparently you are averse to being called to account for what you and yours are categorically responsible for. Not only under the eyes of countless witnesses, but in documentary archives beyond your hysterically whip wielding, theatrically one-eyed, egomaniacal - SplendidToBehold control.

Are you disappointed because your forum handle of GAHD wasn't mentioned in message #77?

Well. Rejoice (You have no choice.) Now it is.

 

However large your squeegee may be, you cannot eradicate or otherwise squeek, ammoniate or otherwise get yourself out of what you've already collusively coordinated to appear as history in: Hypography; under the eyes of innumerable witnesses who've beheld your leavings at this site, and which leavings are archived beyond your blight.

 

You cannot, for example, talk your way out of this by conjuring up poorly veiled threats and extortions in Private Messages, or flailing for an ever enlarging hammer, or, by asking That Rascal Puff how he's going to get out of this (doesn't get you out of this). It is not K. B. Robertson, Aka, That Rascal Puff - TRP - that you are in contention with here; it is the result of your own burning bridges and incontrovertible, functionally undeniable 'behavior'.

 

Moreover, non-violently and gracefully defending myself - and many others - from, by finding the likes of you responsible for what you would attempt to blame on me, is not 'childish'. On the other hand, anything having to do with children is blasphemy when subjected by you; particularly when it's projected on me.

 

You are a self revealed, self eviscerated, stumble gut, third cyclopean generation abuser of power, women, children and innocent persons in general (Re: misanthropic ingrate).

Never mind the vain futility of obliterating my (archived) posts with 'TRP is not worthy of Google' messages. It's yourself and your responsibilities that you cannot escape or otherwise stand up to on open public ground.

(You can run. You may even succeed in permanently banning Truly Yours from Hypography. But: you and all those of your demise, cannot hide. Neither will you ever.)

 

You are an educationally wretched model of someone who is long overdue to learn his limitations. You've permanently branded that lesson on your forehead, smoking rifely through that arrogant 'pirate' headgear you so insolently revel in, right here - and far beyond this Hypography Science Forum, the administration of which you and your busted up ratpack are a greivous insult to, along with all regular morality and law abiding, coming and going, shaking and nodding, off n' on blinking, median lane stinking memberships.

 

Mangudai.

 

- That Rascal Puff, Aka Kent Benjamin Robertson, etceteras

 

(Get used to it, Mr. Splendid Highroller & Co. <Sentena pelkella>).

 

Who's gonna make the next mistake, n' ride the big chrome 3 wheeler on down to fire in the lake? - The B'eagles (paraphrased)

[Queso]

i remember this character from a dream.

 

manipulative bully.

 

one w/eternal smile.

i enjoy observing,

after all

im not the moderator

but before all

during the some

i Am.

So speaking is detected

thru your choice of Gloaming

internet path.

 

This corner guarded by and with Language.

 

Here we go :lol:

[GAHD]

@ turtle and all who read this, I'm sorry your thread got 'hijacked' by what could easilly have been a private discussion.

 

 

@Puff, I do woder why you keep dropping to insults, it's really rather childish. I suppose I could drop to your level and beguile everyone with creative use of French and Japaneise insults, but that wouldn't accomplish anything.

 

As an administrator my job is to see that the site continues funtioning properly, and part of that job is making shure that the membership can enjoy a place free of abuse. This is clearly in the text you just copied & pasted, here i'll even quote it:

Also, rants, flames, arrogant posts, and hit-and-run posts might lead to temporary or permanent banning so please try to behave in here as you would in real life, and everyone will be happy.

 

Important: Never post PMs or e-mails from other users without asking their permissions first. PMs and e-mails are considered private communication and posting them is a violation of the other user's right to privacy. If you have received an offending PM or e-mail, send it to one of the admins. Posts containing PMs and e-mails can be deleted by the admins and might get you banned.

 

If you don't understand what a 'flame' is, you can read the wikipedia entry!

 

my 'Arrogant pirate headgear' is called a 'bandana' or 'kerceif' By the people who know me, it's one of the most useful things around. One might think that douglas Adams got some of his ideas for the usefullness of a towel from pre&post WWII Documentation showing people how to use bandanas and other 'simple' things to survive in contaminated areas long enough for rescue and/or escape.

 

I'm not saying that you are or are not an intelligent individual; but I am saying that you're one of the rudest I've encountered, And that you should Find some more productive use of your mind should you wish to remain active on this site.

 

I'm not shure if you're reffering to me as a horseback archer from the mongol horde, or more to yourself for what would appear to be an attempt at imitating mangudai ambushing tactics, but either way it doesn't seem to be a particularly constructive peice of literature.

 

Now, tell me puff; what should I do to continue doing my job as indicated and see that the site rules are upheld?

 

I will split this thread later so that Turtle may continue uninterrrupeted(sorry again matie) , and that we may continue talking in public if that's what you wish to do. However you may feel about it, it is my job to intervene when 'flaming' occurs, and if it continues I will use the aptly-named-by-Puff-'Squeegee' to obliterate the offensive content.

 

The 'reputation' button is the 'green' square, second from the left above a persons avatar. Please feel free to flame me there if you like, I could use my red back.

[Chacmool]

You are an educationally wretched model of someone who is long overdue to learn his limitations. You've permanently branded that lesson on your forehead, smoking rifely through that arrogant 'pirate' headgear you so insolently revel in, right here - and far beyond this Hypography Science Forum, the administration of which you and your busted up ratpack are a greivous insult to, along with all regular morality and law abiding, coming and going, shaking and nodding, off n' on blinking, median lane stinking memberships.

:lol: I can't believe I just read this... my eyes are burning... Surely this is not the way we treat each other around here.

[Tormod]

Puff - enough is enough. You have broken all our rules so many times now I have lost count. Have a nice life.

[Tormod]

For the record:

 

Important: Never post PMs or e-mails from other users without asking their permissions first. PMs and e-mails are considered private communication and posting them is a violation of the other user's right to privacy. If you have received an offending PM or e-mail, send it to one of the admins. Posts containing PMs and e-mails can be deleted by the admins and might get you banned.

 

No matter how many offenses Puff made, this one WILL get people banned sooner than they imagine. PM's are *private* messages, not "public" messages.

[GAHD]

...smoking rifely through that arrogant 'pirate' headgear you so insolently revel in...

 

I'm still trying to figure out if puff thought I'm smoking in my avatar pic??

[Queso]

haha it kind of looks like some intersteller roach clip..

[Queso]

oh gahd, btw, your bandana + pirate gear rock, man. You could find me with one, if you knew where i was!

[Racoon]

You've plenty to worry about. Take a look at the world's skimpiest swimsuit.

 

*Bump!

 

HaHa... what a great thread. :edizzy: :)

I missed all the action though while it was heated...:eek2:

 

I read all of it, but mostly just skimmed through Rascal Puffs long winded tirades.

 

My questions:

#1 - Where is that swimsuit at? theres where I'm going for vacation. :shrug:

 

#2 - Wheres Irish Eyes been? her posts are great. She worked as a Maj-is-sist. How cool is that?!

 

and Post #20, Rascal Puff asked Turtle if he had ever read "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclaire?

Turtle didn't remember at the time...

 

That was one hell of a depressing book! Someone could write blues music from it.

*refresher* Its about a Big Strong Immigrant dude working in a terrible slaughterhouse, meat packing plant in Chicago. :D :beer:

and all their hardships of living and being exploited.

 

Definitely one you'd remember if you've read it. And geez, that must of been 8 years ago for me...

 

Totally Fielding your Theory,

Racoon