InfiniteNow Posted February 14, 2006 Author Report Posted February 14, 2006 im still skeptical about the "...in our lifetime" statement. <...> im not disagreing, im simply doubting that it will be in our lifetime. also, i dont think that we can even fathom the cresendo of human evolution until it has passed. there is no limit until the par has been set. I understand the percentage might be low, but considering much of what's been happening, I am beginning to think that this all might just happen before the death of the current generation... that it's always approaching that destination anyway... As for fathoming the crescendo being really tough... agreed completely. Thanks for the responses.
David J Posted February 16, 2006 Report Posted February 16, 2006 I've given communications support to the people that could not identify it for themselves. Their time is up for using heaven against the people of this earth by confusing teachings from priests for the teachings of an instructor. Our time has come to relieve ourselves of our problems. I hope communications support will help us get them off our planet.
Queso Posted February 16, 2006 Report Posted February 16, 2006 It's not just biological evolution, josh. It's our advances in technology, as well.like the cloning of the human, neurochemistry, and AI. how can you not see it happening in our lifetime?it's inevitable.
David J Posted February 16, 2006 Report Posted February 16, 2006 I'm on the computer... but I did step in some important information if thats what your talking about ;) ...
Racoon Posted February 16, 2006 Report Posted February 16, 2006 Thats exactly right Orby! ;) Advances in AI
David J Posted February 16, 2006 Report Posted February 16, 2006 I know I look out(?) of(?) place(?) with what I wrote and even though what I wrote was pretty efficient, it couldn't be as efficient as the structure of the events that you guys are talking about. It won't be long until I identify the events of this topic. I don't want to be rude but I'm sure that some of the words you used to identify those events are inefficient. Heaven hasn't enslaved you as you act like it has. The Galaxy is above the Heavens like the Heavens are above the Earth. ;) i miss my cat pearl... although the smiley doesn't look like my cat, I use it so you will know my place.
Racoon Posted February 16, 2006 Report Posted February 16, 2006 What is so efficient about saying efficient(?) What is so Structure about saying the Structure(?)
InfiniteNow Posted February 16, 2006 Author Report Posted February 16, 2006 Okay... it's amazing what types of unexpected posts occur when you ask an abstract question... It's like a painting slowly forming in front of me. I see it happening, but do not know what the final picture will be... (?) ;)
arkain101 Posted February 17, 2006 Report Posted February 17, 2006 Are we really living when we contimplate ourselves living? or is true living really just being somewhat of an automaton filling its needs.. heh. besides, there has been so much philosophy, ideology, and guidence for human behaviour ... I take a look around sometimes and ask.. does it really make a difference? it is so difficult to turn off the part of the brain that is claimed to be from ealier evolution. That part that acts as a reptillian kind of automaton. There can be so much talk, but so many actions occur when the emotional reflex part of the mind takes over and you have a natural anamilistic world in its whole hearted display. If we wanted to advanced to some kind of new species, it would seem to require that like the typical advanced species in sci-fi fiction flicks where species have subdood emotion and natural reaction/response, and everything is logically and analytically played out. This type of change would definatly help the way humans behave.. but where does so much of life go when you take away everything that seems to make it up. Should life be taken so seriously.. should death be welcomed and accepted as a great time instead of such a painful loss type of situation.. I like how Nikola Tesla said something along the lines that, I can be a great thinker at times but every action I do in my life is a invevitable path of my reactions to stimulus around me. In other words, you can be perfect in your mind with the greatest ideology, but all the while you are absolutly unable to escape the responses to natural reflexes.. and so its safe to say we are thinking witnesses in a bit of an automanton vehicle.
InfiniteNow Posted February 17, 2006 Author Report Posted February 17, 2006 Should life be taken so seriously.. should death be welcomed and accepted as a great time instead of such a painful loss type of situation.. But what is life without death by which to define it?
arkain101 Posted February 17, 2006 Report Posted February 17, 2006 Im not so sure I can agree that life is defined by the opposite of which it is. Meaning, being dead is what allows one to compare themself to being alive and declare life as so. Death is an experience, like getting your first nooky.. Its part of life, but once passed on, to the point of no return. It is unknown how existence came to be. We wake up in our little child bodies or I mean start collecting memories at a certain young age and then we can remember we are alive. Prior to that, we have no evidence of being so, yet we laugh and smile and play. My point is the mysteriousness of life opens up the ability to consider that which isnt and I think it is not much stranger to think of myself appearing in a different realm, life, or body as it is to think about myself apearing here and now in this one.
David J Posted February 21, 2006 Report Posted February 21, 2006 hmm... I'd rather not explain those two terms or the events that they are most efficiently enacted in, If I didn't see anything within the explainations that could cause something I didn't want to happen I would give an explaination to your question. My events for communcations support are inefficient, they need to be revised. You'll understand the final revisions. The only question you could ask about the final revisions would be about what(?) structures the keys.
InfiniteNow Posted February 24, 2006 Author Report Posted February 24, 2006 My events for communcations support are inefficient, they need to be revised. You'll understand the final revisions. The only question you could ask about the final revisions would be about what(?) structures the keys.Uhmm, yeah. Okay... that's super. Thanks. Now, back on point: We are constantly 'hatching,' pushing through the shells which have surrounded us for millenia. What do you foresee will comose the world outside... in front of us?
Tarantism Posted February 25, 2006 Report Posted February 25, 2006 hmm... I'd rather not explain those two terms or the events that they are most efficiently enacted in, If I didn't see anything within the explainations that could cause something I didn't want to happen I would give an explaination to your question. My events for communcations support are inefficient, they need to be revised. You'll understand the final revisions. The only question you could ask about the final revisions would be about what(?) structures the keys. :shrug: :hyper: :)
InfiniteNow Posted July 10, 2006 Author Report Posted July 10, 2006 We are constantly 'hatching,' pushing through the shells which have surrounded us for millenia. What do you foresee will come of the world outside... in front of us? Comments, good, bad, and otherwise are encouraged. :eek2: Cheers. :)Anyone else?
Queso Posted July 10, 2006 Report Posted July 10, 2006 Well you know me, I believe consciousness is going to experience an orgasm sometime soon.
Recommended Posts