New Universe Model...

[hegne]

Hello Friends,

 

I'm studying on fluid dynamics and quantum physics for about two years. I realized that there are really interesting similarities between fluids and subatomic particles' behaviours. I have written an article on this subject. I would like to you read my article and take your comment about it. You can read my article from this adress :

http://super-fluid-universe.8m.com

[arkain101]

Very cool.

 

I like this model and it fits with my thoughts.

 

I may of just had a breakthrough. Because, we can continue coming up new models and theories, but since relativity is well established it needs to be perfectly proved or debunked.

 

This 'breakthrough' which is coming from an amateur of course may have some very sound evidence to debunk special relativity in particular areas. Most importantly, lights constant velocity. After studying the experiments and theories related to this, I think I've found the missing chunk.

 

I have some more work to do but I will post up here soon as possible to get some opinions.

[arkain101]

Could I ask you friendly members to put up some good links on the experiments that were to determine the fact of light having a constant? There are a couple that I can think of but I would apreciate the help. I noticed alot of you have some really good links for detail and explanation.

 

I think I am really onto something..

[hegne]

Dear arkain101,

 

I see what you mean. Thanks for your interest. I wanna see your links and any other thing that will help us.

[hegne]

I have posted this article some other forums also.

I wanna share one of the replies:

 

"Have you seen that the general solution of a superconducting charge-field is the hydrodynamic equation? Look if Feynman Lectures III, 21-13. He actually said, "Now none of you has seen this eq." but I was an Aero major at Princeton and could have raised my hand, as you can also, no? I have field solutions similar to what you speak of - check my profile url."

 

http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/member.php?u=7826

 

"When you allow variable charge density distribution you get the compressible fluid-flow eq. as if it were an "ideal charged fluid". "

[arkain101]

I came across a pretty good link describing the Michelson Morley Experiment. This one is interactive even.

http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/more_stuff/flashlets/mmexpt6.htm

[InfiniteNow]

You all might find some interest in the double slit thread...

 

http://hypography.com/forums/physics-mathematics/5327-double-slit-experiment.html

 

 

 

Cheers. :)

[TheFaithfulStone]

That's pretty cool, Hegne.

 

Intuitively it makes sense - but that doesn't mean much I suspect, since intuitively, quantum mechanics DOES NOT make sense.

 

TFS

[hegne]

Hello guys,

 

I wanna share a link with you. I hope you will undertand it. It is about "Vortex solitons: Mass, energy, and angular momentum bunching

in relativistic electron-positron plasmas"

 

http://www.ppl.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~tatsuno/research/papers/VortSolit-1.pdf

[sanctus]

Nice article hegne,

there is only a detail that disturbs me (I havn't read the article very profoundly for lack of time, so I just thrust that all the physics indie holds): on the second paragraph you say:

"The transition from pure energy state to an energy-matter state at the Big-Bang moment can only be explained like this."

It's a bit too absolute, surely it can be explained like this, but how can you state it's the only way?

[arkain101]

As I have been working along, and doing some minor experiments.

 

It appears this theory of absolute relativity predicts the type of fluid dynamics for aether.

 

It is interesting to see they connect.

 

The test to prove/disprove this theory is going to be happening soon. Should be exciting results!