William Honey Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Honey, six gilled sharks are not megalodon, megalodon sharks are extinct, have been for a very long time. Megalodon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Six gilled sharks are a rare group of deep water species that have nothing common with megalodon other than being sharks. They are only very distantly related. I give up Moon, you win, okay........ My Paranormal Life: Megalodon caught on tape Sunday, November 05, 2006Megalodon caught on tape Had a dry spell in interesting news and media this week but this is just to good to be true. This video shows a huge giant shark claimed to be a Megalodon filmed by I think some Japanese show. It also has a few giant squid shots in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 I give up Moon, you win, okay........ My Paranormal Life: Megalodon caught on tape Sunday, November 05, 2006Megalodon caught on tape Had a dry spell in interesting news and media this week but this is just to good to be true. This video shows a huge giant shark claimed to be a Megalodon filmed by I think some Japanese show. It also has a few giant squid shots in it. I'm not trying to be an ******* Honey, six gilled sharks are not megalodon and a short flick of a supposed megalodon does not a megalodon make. I've seen short flicks of huge UFOs flying over the white house, the film looked like an invasion fleet, funny no one else saw them. Even a single 60 foot predator like megalodon would be pretty obvious from it's effects on everything in the ocean. Such a shark would be eating everything coming and going, and a reproducing population would be impossible to miss. Giant squids are real, they wash up on share from time to time. Lots of them in preserved animal collections. It's a cheap way to show your fake film has credentials by showing something real along with something that is bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Honey Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Okay Moon, I did see a documentary about marine biologist that had found a spot inthe ocean where they filmed a huge shark and huge gar fish. The documentary saidthe the shark was a Megalodon shark. The shark they showed was not a six gill shark.The shark was huge like nothing I had ever seen before. The fin came out of the waterabout five feet and the fin was huge. They showed the shark underwater and it lookedlike a submarine. I don't know where the people who produced the documentary gotthe footage of the huge shark and I don't know why that they called the shark a Megalodon but they did. Why people would put a science documentary together like this I don't know but that was one huge shark that they had on the film and they fooled me saying it was a Megalodon. Since nobody has covered the whole bottom floor of the ocean or covered the wholeocean, is it possible that their are still Megalodon sharks out there? The gar fish also were huge and I saw them and they did attack the cameraman. Ifthis was fake then it was a darn good fake as it did fool me, okay. This science documentary was not selling anything, it was just reporting a find thatthey had found an area in the ocean that had huge sharks and huge gar fish and theyfilmed it and reported it. My thought was that the area where the supposed Megalodonwas, that food in that area may have had a high steroid content which would explainthe huge shark and gar fish. This documentary was not computer generated as Ican tell a computer generated film. This shark was real and the marine biologist werereal and it was a science documentary. Could this shark they called a Megalodon be a new species of shark as new speciesof animals are found all the time ? A whale shark is also huge like a Megalodon,could this have been a species similar to a whale shark, that has not been discoveredyet ?? Maybe someday this science documentary will come back on and you can watch it. For the sake of ending this, lets just say that the science documentary was a fake, okay. William Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Okay Moon, I did see a documentary about marine biologist that had found a spot inthe ocean where they filmed a huge shark and huge gar fish. The documentary saidthe the shark was a Megalodon shark. The shark they showed was not a six gill shark.The shark was huge like nothing I had ever seen before. The fin came out of the waterabout five feet and the fin was huge. They showed the shark underwater and it lookedlike a submarine. I don't know where the people who produced the documentary gotthe footage of the huge shark and I don't know why that they called the shark a Megalodon but they did. Why people would put a science documentary together like this I don't know but that was one huge shark that they had on the film and they fooled me saying it was a Megalodon. Since nobody has covered the whole bottom floor of the ocean or covered the wholeocean, is it possible that their are still Megalodon sharks out there? The gar fish also were huge and I saw them and they did attack the cameraman. Ifthis was fake then it was a darn good fake as it did fool me, okay. This science documentary was not selling anything, it was just reporting a find thatthey had found an area in the ocean that had huge sharks and huge gar fish and theyfilmed it and reported it. My thought was that the area where the supposed Megalodonwas, that food in that area may have had a high steroid content which would explainthe huge shark and gar fish. This documentary was not computer generated as Ican tell a computer generated film. This shark was real and the marine biologist werereal and it was a science documentary. Could this shark they called a Megalodon be a new species of shark as new speciesof animals are found all the time ? A whale shark is also huge like a Megalodon,could this have been a species similar to a whale shark, that has not been discoveredyet ?? Maybe someday this science documentary will come back on and you can watch it. For the sake of ending this, lets just say that the science documentary was a fake, okay. William Honey, if indeed such a thing has been discovered it would be all over the science news and blogs, probably on the evening news as well. I think what you saw was called walking with prehistoric beasts, I saw several of them and in on a diver was attacked by a sea scorpion the size of a car. It was very realistic, impossible to tell from the real thing. My wife saw a similar show about dragons and was convinced they had found real evidence of dragons. many people were fooled by that show. These shows were meant to be impossible to tell from reality. If not then i can't imagine why the science sites and the net hasn't be alive with the reports, a new species of dwarf frog is everywhere the moment it is announced, a new giant shark would be huge news and a whale eating gar would be all over the fish and science forums as well as the national news. Any chance the reporters first name was Nigel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted October 2, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Erhm...uhh...well...the topic here is supposed to be the strange claims of Bigfoot. Feel free to start other Strange Claim threads on other cryptoids. Dank. :D :eek: Buffy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted October 2, 2008 Report Share Posted October 2, 2008 Erhm...uhh...well...the topic here is supposed to be the strange claims of Bigfoot. Feel free to start other Strange Claim threads on other cryptoids. Dank. :D :eek: I be sorry Turtle, I'll smack my hand four times and promise to do better. If it matters I put much more stock in big foot than a population of extant megalodons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted October 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2008 I be sorry Turtle, I'll smack my hand four times and promise to do better. If it matters I put much more stock in big foot than a population of extant megalodons. I love ya Moon! I promise if I get the chance on one of my expeditions into the deep Cascade mountains, to shoot a Sasquatch in da big foot, I will do so and justify it in the name of phlebotomy & da Moon Tan Man. :D :eek: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turtle Posted October 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2008 Okaly dokaly. Now granted MoonTan's burden of proof is not met by videography, but an interesting 'something' is at least, well, interesting. This video is a time compression of a trip into the Cascades that terminates a spits distance over a valley from a recent reported Sasquatch sighting. It may be the case that I actually recorded the beast along side of the road, but because I had to compress the time, I have not spotted it. If we step through this, maybe we can spot something interesting. ;) :hyper: YouTube - Cascade Mountain Sasquatch & Wagon Route Scout http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oMupUBk9Ao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Racoon Posted October 3, 2008 Report Share Posted October 3, 2008 If only you hadn't muted out what you/we were saying in the video Turtle. :hihi: Pure Genius.:hyper:;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Racoon Posted October 3, 2008 Report Share Posted October 3, 2008 Can't wait for next years expedition.. Better through refinement and experience. ;);):hihi::hihi::):):hyper: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted October 3, 2008 Report Share Posted October 3, 2008 Well I'm left out again since I can't watch U-tube videos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Racoon Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 Get the survival wagon back out Turtle!! http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/bigfoot-evidence-screened-expert-claims-proof-existence-170135552--abc-news-tech.html Seems if you put some serious money into Research you are bound to find something. :dogwalk: The footage, which came from a similar effort dubbed The Erickson Project, led by Adrian Erickson, showed what the group said was a sasquatch moving through wooded areas in Kentucky. Dr. Melba Ketchum, who has led the group of researchers called the Sasquatch Genome Project, has been working on a $500,000 analysis of DNA samples from an unknown hominin species. Ketchum calls the project "a serious study" that concludes the legendary Sasquatch exists in North America and is a human relative that arose approximately 13,000 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.