Sobabi Posted March 14, 2006 Report Posted March 14, 2006 the only reason why i gave reasons for each, is because according to evolution, things evolve because they need them. Well, althought that is good simple discription of the outcome of evoultion, i don't think it really explains the way it works. Evolution does not have an aim, its a random process "guided" by natural selection. Humans never need wings or needed to run faster. If they had, they probably would have died off rather than randomly came up with the genetic mutations to develope them. I guess what i am saying that technology better explains why we are still here (if physically we are not so apt at survival), rather than assuming that we would be here but asking why we are not different to what we are now. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.