motherengine Posted March 14, 2006 Report Posted March 14, 2006 this is a revised question from the past. a director of a particularly violent film said in an interview that he dislikes actual violence and that he would let a mosquito suck his blood and fly off if one happened upon his arm. i happen to think that his statement reflects an ignorance in common thought where one cannot realize a thing as violent unless it visibly effects the external body of an individual. and i wonder if this type of ignorance is related to the poor handling of mental health in america? it seems to me that most people have difficulty stepping into other's shoes (so to speak) and this inability is magnified when confronted by those who are internally as opposed to externally crippled. most of my scars are on the inside so my experiences with others in relationship to this fact have colored my perspective on this issue. is there any hope for the child within? Quote
InfiniteNow Posted March 14, 2006 Report Posted March 14, 2006 is there any hope for the child within?Always. Quote
infamous Posted March 14, 2006 Report Posted March 14, 2006 Remember the passion of youth,never forget those goals,to find that better way.Resist subjugation to comformity. With the coming of age, resist the death of your youth................Infy Quote
ben77 Posted March 14, 2006 Report Posted March 14, 2006 People just want to feel important in this world of 9 billion.Jimmy: "oh no, thats violent, better ***** about it".Jimmy 2 the media: "yeh the world would be great without this.. yeh"Jimmy: "i really made a differance, now i can die feeling im special". Ok thanks for your opinion, we dont care. Whiney mothers and people who have an opinion dont make a differance. They can only stop their own children from being subjected to this market of entertainment.People want to save the world.. if they want to try, they can stop driving their bloody cars, walk to work, get some exercise and avoid having a heart attack which costs tax payers money. Quote
motherengine Posted March 16, 2006 Author Report Posted March 16, 2006 People just want to feel important in this world of 9 billion.Jimmy: "oh no, thats violent, better ***** about it".Jimmy 2 the media: "yeh the world would be great without this.. yeh"Jimmy: "i really made a differance, now i can die feeling im special". Ok thanks for your opinion, we dont care. Whiney mothers and people who have an opinion dont make a differance. They can only stop their own children from being subjected to this market of entertainment.People want to save the world.. if they want to try, they can stop driving their bloody cars, walk to work, get some exercise and avoid having a heart attack which costs tax payers money. who said anything about wanting to change the world? i was posing a question concerning mental violence. if you don't believe it is worth talking about then why are you responding to it. you seem to be of the mind that words are pointless. obviously i disagree. Quote
infamous Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 you seem to be of the mind that words are pointless. obviously i disagree.And I also disagree mother engine. Anyone that feels that words are worthless should avoid posting any opinions........Infy Quote
Rebiu Posted March 18, 2006 Report Posted March 18, 2006 this is a revised question from the past. a director of a particularly violent film said in an interview that he dislikes actual violence and that he would let a mosquito suck his blood and fly off if one happened upon his arm. i happen to think that his statement reflects an ignorance in common thought where one cannot realize a thing as violent unless it visibly effects the external body of an individual. and i wonder if this type of ignorance is related to the poor handling of mental health in america?I think it is less an issue of ignorance than one of sensitivity. Do you wince at cartoon anvils falling on head? Perhaps this is how desensitized this person is to simulated violence. it seems to me that most people have difficulty stepping into other's shoes (so to speak) and this inability is magnified when confronted by those who are internally as opposed to externally crippled.There is perhaps another issue here with regards to judgments on what degree a person should cope with said scars as opposed to expecting everyone else to treat them as damaged goods. most of my scars are on the inside so my experiences with others in relationship to this fact have colored my perspective on this issue. is there any hope for the child within?Have you adequately dealt with these issues or are the baggage you continue to carry about? Quote
motherengine Posted March 22, 2006 Author Report Posted March 22, 2006 I think it is less an issue of ignorance than one of sensitivity. Do you wince at cartoon anvils falling on head? Perhaps this is how desensitized this person is to simulated violence.There is perhaps another issue here with regards to judgments on what degree a person should cope with said scars as opposed to expecting everyone else to treat them as damaged goods. Have you adequately dealt with these issues or are the baggage you continue to carry about? i suppose that i am thinking about ignorance of sensitivity. a lack of belief in, or respect for, what one cannot touch and see. it is not about asking for pity. it is about coping with an imbalance in perception. i expect no special treatment. i would simply appreciate equal understanding. and no, i think my demons will follow me into the abyss. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.