freeztar Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 I starting wondering too if the kept back stuff might clog the nano tubes pretty fast? I was thinking the same thing while reading the article. They mention the power necessary for current reverse-osmosis tech. They attribute the inefficiency of the system to the KwH necessary to run it. Apparently, the nano-tubes have much higher efficiency, but when you pass more material (in a filtration sense), it seems logical that more 'sediment' would accumulate along the outer surface of the semi-permeable membrane that is the nano-structure. Of course, the increased flow is directly linked to the nm porosity. Still, at some critical point, one would expect a "log jam" that severs efficiency dramatically. One cool thing about Turtle's 'straw collimator' is that it neglects porosity and microscopic effects. Macroscopic tech can lead to innovations in similarly-based microscopic tech. Turt's homemade 'Wind Accumulator-Facilitator' could possibly be a model for a nano-scale collimator made from single-shell nano-fibers, and no substrate required. Quote
Pyrotex Posted June 27, 2008 Report Posted June 27, 2008 yes, that would do it, but the walls would have to be a hell of a lot thinner Alexander.How do you get thinner than ONE atom thick? :rolleyes: :bow: Quote
alexander Posted June 28, 2008 Report Posted June 28, 2008 come on, pyro, can't believe you asked this one electron thick, ofcourse :steering: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.