Is Time Travel Possible?

[kvraghavaiah]

Definitely time travel may not be possible.We can come to understand it if we think for a little while logically.but we can estimate the past :shrug: :hihi: and also see the past with advanced future science and tech.There is a chance that the cyclic universe(temporally) may come through all the states it had in the past and thus we may be able to see the past in the future.

[arkain101]

I have come to understand you can change the rate you see things, but you will never change a posistion in time in your own frame.

[arkain101]

extended,

 

I need to edit this.. I posted while being distracted. :(

 

Two types of time.

 

Time 1: The visual information carried in light that displays a rate of change. ex. A clock can be seen to move faster but this is only a measurement of the light.

note: this version of time is not fundamental (under this theory of Alt relativity) it is a measurement of the rate of incoming change.

 

Time 2: A universal syncronized time for all matter. Ex. a series of lights at multiple distances from an observer can turn on at the exact same moment. However, an observer that is located in a rest posistion will never see them come on at the same moment. The lights matter is synced but what is seen is only what is in the observers frame and it is relative to that observer, thus the time, or what a clock measures is variable.

note:this version of time is fundamental. (current SR says the laws of physics and the speed of light is the same for all frames of observation). (ASR says the same thing, AR=alternative relativity)

 

Is this for the quantum entanglement?

 

Theoretically yes. Due to it being possible for all reference frames of matter to be in sync it should directly imply that by some means they can instanty influence eachother. However I do not know exactly how the appartus is set up to cause this to occur so I can not say for sure. But the time for matter is equal at all distance thats the principle.

[InfiniteNow]

Time is said to be syncronized for all material

I'm not sure I follow completely your point. Do you intend to refer to entanglement?

[arkain101]

post above edited.

[Jay-qu]

I like that, but I dont know how correct it is, have to do some more reading.

[arkain101]

If so, you may want to keep up with the thread on this theory.

 

http://hypography.com/forums/physics-mathematics/9110-special-relativity-alternatives.html