TheFaithfulStone Posted June 23, 2006 Report Posted June 23, 2006 It's the 535 members of the United States Congress. So is that 373 separate people, or do the offenses overlap? Anybody batting 1.000? TFS Quote
Mercedes Benzene Posted June 23, 2006 Report Posted June 23, 2006 Hmmm... I doubt it is 373 seperate people. The chances of that seem very slim to me. Usually if you have done one thing illegal, you are going to do more. Also, some of those offenses could possibly go together (eg: writing bad checks and fraud).I would also like to see the demographical breakup for those Congress members:*House of Reps. v. Senate*Democrat v. Republican*Race v. Race*Male v. Female Those would be some pretty interesting statistics to compliment the offenses. :hyper: Quote
TheFaithfulStone Posted June 23, 2006 Report Posted June 23, 2006 I want to vote for the guy who's done all of them. At least I can say he values thoroughness. TFS Quote
Mercedes Benzene Posted June 23, 2006 Report Posted June 23, 2006 I want to vote for the guy who's done all of them. At least I can say he values thoroughness. TFS Hahahhahaha!I don't know.... He/she may be thorough, but I am not sure they are the person who is going to most positively affect our nation! Quote
Racoon Posted June 23, 2006 Author Report Posted June 23, 2006 Heres more examples of Bush doing whatever the hell he wants! WASHINGTON - The Bush administration will have to explain why it thinks it can ignore or overrule laws passed by Congress in a hearing next week, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter said Wednesday. Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, said he hoped to force the Bush administration to reduce its use of "signing statements" -- memos that reserve the right to ignore laws if the president thinks they impinge on his authority.....Bush has signed at least 750 such memos since taking office in 2001, according to the Boston Globe, more than previous presidential administrations combined. Bush has used signing statements to signal that he might bypass a ban on the torture of U.S.-held prisoners and ignore new provisions in an anti-terrorism law that call for increased congressional oversight. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13489537/ Quote
IDMclean Posted June 23, 2006 Report Posted June 23, 2006 Wow... I smell Hitler, I mean hijinks. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.