Crow_of_Darkness Posted May 2, 2006 Report Posted May 2, 2006 Hello all, its my first post and i believe i writte in the correct place. If not please remove it. So here is the question. Suppose we have two Nuclear devises of equal power. The first explodes 300 metres over the surfase and the other many miles away, in the surface of the ground. Which bomb, will be responsible for the bigger pollution? Why? I have hear that this that will explode on the surface, will be responsible for about 10 times bigger pollution. Is this true? Why? Please explain. Thank you. :singer: Quote
UncleAl Posted May 8, 2006 Report Posted May 8, 2006 Fission products from a fission warhead are a given quantity. An air burst disperses the stuff through a tremendous volume of air over a tremendous surface area below before it hits the ground. The fission products are largely short-lived beta- and gamma-emitters. Delay to exposure is good. The solution to pollution is dilution. A ground burst mixes fission products with a huge mass of pulverized dirt which then dumps down. Rapid, concentrated, and nasty if you are under it. The dirtiest bomb is a three-stage hydrgen bomb. A dozen kilos of fissile material is the trigger for the fusion stage. The fusion stage is quite clean aside from its plutonium carrot detonator. Excess fast neutrons, lots of them, fission the U-238 bomb case. A big H-bomb is a uranium burner of essentially unlimited size. The fission product fallout is immense, even for air bursts. --Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz3.pdf Quote
ronthepon Posted May 12, 2006 Report Posted May 12, 2006 So, as I understand it, nuclear bombs blown on the surface cause more pollution because it contaminates the surface soil?Did I get that right? Quote
Mercedes Benzene Posted May 12, 2006 Report Posted May 12, 2006 I suppose it really depends on what you consider to be the most damaging "form" of pollution. A bomb detonated above the surface would definitely cause more immediate damage from radioisotopes... at least to people and other "terranean" organisms. An underground detonation would cause more long term damage if the fission products penetrated underground wells and aquifers. Also, nearby crops and other flora would be greatly affected... that is if they survived the blast... haha :hihi: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.