Jump to content
Science Forums

Wormholes


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
As a passing-by remark, I feel that wormholes need some very hard re-evaluation on our scientific theories.
Do you mean “current scientific theories need re-evaluation based on observations of wormholes” or “the possibility of wormholes existing needs re-evaluation based on current scientific theories”?

 

It’s important to note that while current theory suggest that large wormholes may be possible, and nearly unobservable and sub-sub-microscopic ones may be common, there’s currently no observational data to support that either large or small wormholes actually exist.

 

Current best theory is very lacking in suggestions for how to construct a wormhole artificially, mostly suggesting that some sort of “exotic matter” exhibiting gravitational repulsion would be required. This is in effect answering an unknown existence question (can wormholes exist?) with another (can gravitationally repulsive matter exist?).

 

(Of course, all of the above is to-the-best-of-my-(inexpert)-knowledge)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Einstien-Rosen bridge is a mathmatical solution to equations we use to desribe our universe ron, this is how black holes where first postulated also, no we beleive we actually know the location of several black holes. The problem with wormholes is that we *cant* see them even if they did exsist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...