Freethinker Posted September 20, 2004 Report Posted September 20, 2004 T, do you really want to get me started? Don't give me straight lines unless I'm allowed to pick up on them! It's not nice to tease.
Tormod Posted September 20, 2004 Report Posted September 20, 2004 It must be the influence of that "hypopathic" title...
TeleMad Posted September 21, 2004 Report Posted September 21, 2004 Freethinker: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------TeleMad: ...compressional waves of air must enter our ear and strike our tympanic membrane - our eardrum.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yet even this is incorrect as at lower frequencies the sound is transmitted thru cranial bone transmission. What a fricking twit you are Freethinker.
Tormod Posted September 21, 2004 Report Posted September 21, 2004 Originally posted by: TeleMadWhat a fricking twit you are Freethinker. You may think so for all it's worth - but I see no reason for you pointing it out here. Use a private message if you need to lower yourself to namecalling.
Freethinker Posted September 21, 2004 Report Posted September 21, 2004 Originally posted by: TeleMadWhat a fricking twit you are Freethinker.Thanks for your constructive addition to our discussion. We all benefit from additional factual details. Especially something so obviously well researched, documented and intellectually constructed for presentation.
Freethinker Posted September 21, 2004 Report Posted September 21, 2004 "Response of Human Skull to Bone Conducted Sound in the Audiometric to Ultrasonic Range...Bone conduction refers to the response of the bones of the skull to audio and higher frequency vibrations, and to the transmission of such vibrations to, and the reception by, the auditory organ."http://www.hearultraquiet.com/Pages/Human%20Skull%20Response.PDF
TeleMad Posted September 22, 2004 Report Posted September 22, 2004 What you "caught" me on was nothing more than a poor word choice. Your whole "refutation" of me rests on one word - I said 'must' and you pointed out that that word is not technically accurate. Big deal. But what about the other way around? Well, in addition to my catching you on several separate instances of poor word choice, I pointed out your error regarding entropy in one thread, and your numerous, repeated errors about mutations in another. We've also seen how low you'll stoop - trying to twist things around, setting up strawmen, and so on. So try to gloat all you want...you've lost. I know it, everyone else knows it, and you know it too.
Freethinker Posted September 22, 2004 Report Posted September 22, 2004 I surrend Telemut. You are the boss. We all bow to your excellence! I even apologize for "catching" what I thought was an error. How could I have been so misguided as to think you could possibly ever error? I am not worthy! And thanks once more for providing a post which so dramatically furthers the intellectual capital of this lowly web site!
Freethinker Posted September 22, 2004 Report Posted September 22, 2004 Sorry Tormod. Once I started down the slippery slope of self deprecating. I got carried away, Your the boss, Da Man, We all bow to your excellence! To the excellence of this incredible resource you have so magnanimously provided to the world. I am not worthy!
Freethinker Posted September 22, 2004 Report Posted September 22, 2004 Oh and Irish, your the boss! You Da Man... er ops... getting really slippery around here! :-)
TeleMad Posted September 23, 2004 Report Posted September 23, 2004 FreeThinker: I surrend Telemut. ... And in another thread, FreeThinker bastardizes my handle by calling me TeleFoamsAtTheMouth. And Tormod doesn't say a thing. So I guess Tormod won't mind if I start bastardizing FreeThinker's handle. Maybe NonThinker, or maybe FreeSexForYoungBoys? Hmmm, which should I use?
Recommended Posts