Michaelangelica Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 I didn't want to put this thread in any particular forum eg Physicsbecause I wanted a mixed forum to discuss some of the more "left-field" aspects of the man.Favourite quotes, miscellany, history, quirky bits, Was he right?, anything really. Just to "chew the fat" around the general subject of EinsteinFor those of us who equate physics as unknowable as religion For example I am reading a strange book about the travels of his brain after his death. Very weird.I am just starting to get interested after 200 pages.(I will post more when I find out what happened) Also if E=MC2 etcHow do you measure "M" ? kilos/ pounds? /atomic weight? -- Michael Quote
Aki Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 Also if E=MC2 etcHow do you measure "M" ? kilos/ pounds? /atomic weight? m is in kilogram, which is the standard unit for mass. Michaelangelica 1 Quote
Michaelangelica Posted May 20, 2006 Author Report Posted May 20, 2006 m is in kilogram, which is the standard unit for mass.So the energy in a kilo of sugar would be: E=1x186,000x186,000mpsorE=1x299,792,458x299,792,458 ?(both metric measurements?)= very big number which means what? Quote
ronthepon Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 Well, actually one can use any mass type in mind, gram, kilogram, amu, etc. Just remember that the energy found out won't be in Joules if one does not use Kg. It'll be something else like erg or of that sort. Quote
Michaelangelica Posted May 20, 2006 Author Report Posted May 20, 2006 wowJust looked at the web on EinsteinHeaps of stuffhe is more popular than ElvisI have three things in common with him!Ten Obscure Factoids Concerning Albert Einsteinhttp://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980907140525data_trunc_sys.shtml1. He Liked His Feet Naked "When I was young, I found out that the big toe always ends up making a hole in the sock," he once said. "So I stopped wearing socks." Einstein was also a fanatical slob, refusing to "dress properly" for anyone. Either people knew him or they didn't, he reasoned - so it didn't matter either way. 2. He Hated Scrabble(My wife (michael-AlWAYS gets all 7 letters out on a triple woprd score, totally demoralising) Aside from his favourite past-time sailing ("the sport which demands the least energy"), Einstein shunned any recreational activity that required mental agility. As he told the New York Times, "When I get through with work I don't want anything that requires the working of the mind." 3. He Was A Rotten Speller Although he lived for many years in the United States and was fully bilingual, Einstein claimed never to be able to write in English because of "the treacherous spelling". He never lost his distinctive German accent either, summed up by his catch-phrase "I vill a little t'ink". O yes 4I have a neurotic cat too.:eek: I am still confused about E=Mc2Seems I am multiplying oranges with apples? Quote
ronthepon Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 Congrats. You are Albert Einstein v 2.0! Feel free to pinpoint your problem. Quote
CraigD Posted May 20, 2006 Report Posted May 20, 2006 So the energy in a kilo of sugar would be:…E=1x,792,458x299,792,458…= very big number which means what?It’s a very big number measuring Energy, which is a measure of the ability to perform Work. Stating units, we have:E = (1 kilograms)*(299,792,458 meters/second)*(299,792,458 meters/second)= 89875517873681764 kilograms*meters^2/seconds^2Because kg*m^2/s^2 is such a standard unit of work and energy, there’s a special name (honoring, as do many unit names, an long-dead scientist) for it: Joules, the standard abbreviation of which is J. Although the Joule is not a well known unit among non-scientists, the unit of power for it is. Joules/second are known as Watts (named after the famous engineer), with standard abbreviation W So, a totally annihilated kg of sugar (or anything) would create 89875517873681764 J of energy, which is enough energy to allow every one of the 6,500,000,000 human being on earth to use a 1500 W hair-dryer for slightly more than 9200 seconds, or about 2.5 hours. In purely mechanical terms, it’s the amount of energy needed to hoist a nearly 100,000,000 kg aircraft carrier to the 10,000 m cruising altitude of an airliner almost 9,000 times! (assuming the equipment used is 100% mechanically efficient) Numbers like this should give one a sense of why professional and amateur engineers get so excited about power systems with the potential to convert kgs of stored matter to energy, such as antimatter. Quote
Michaelangelica Posted May 21, 2006 Author Report Posted May 21, 2006 Wow!ThankyouFrom now on I'm going to use less sugar in my tea!:doh: Another dumb questionSo, we have the theory, what is stopping the practice? You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to CraigD again. Quote
ronthepon Posted May 21, 2006 Report Posted May 21, 2006 What stops the practice is lack of a known technique. But you have indeed heard of nuclear fusion, and nuclear fission. That is all the practice where we convert big time mass into energy Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.