Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's won't crystallize into ice unless there's some transition energy provided, no. 

 

 

 

One does not "provide" energy to water to freeze it.  A cold environment does the opposite by removing kinetic molecular energy.

You are right but for the wrong reason.  The corollary question is "Does ice melt at 0 degrees Celsius?"

 

Both cannot happen at the same temperature.  In fact, neither one can.  The environment has to be warmer than 0 to melt ice and colder than 0 to freeze  water.  At precisely zero, there is perfect equilibrium, as in the triple  point.  This is overlooked by all chemistry classes and professors as they teach the zero mantra.

Posted

One does not "provide" energy to water to freeze it.  A cold environment does the opposite by removing kinetic molecular energy.

You are right but for the wrong reason.  The corollary question is "Does ice melt at 0 degrees Celsius?"

 

Both cannot happen at the same temperature.  In fact, neither one can.  The environment has to be warmer than 0 to melt ice and colder than 0 to freeze  water.  At precisely zero, there is perfect equilibrium, as in the triple  point.  This is overlooked by all chemistry classes and professors as they teach the zero mantra.

Yeah.. yer wrong. It DOES take energy to transition away from liquid state, even from liquid to solid. I think you don't understand molecular lattices. :) For exactly different reasons than that the propane thing works it's magic, (really any compressed liquid -> decompressed gas transition) liquid -> solid takes a bit of energy to arrange and order itself. That's WHY you can super-cool pure fluids, they don't have the energy they need to move into a lattice shape. It's also one of the keys to Ice II and Ice III

Posted (edited)

Yeah.. yer wrong. It DOES take energy to transition away from liquid state, even from liquid to solid. I think you don't understand molecular lattices. :) For exactly different reasons than that the propane thing works it's magic, (really any compressed liquid -> decompressed gas transition) liquid -> solid takes a bit of energy to arrange and order itself. That's WHY you can super-cool pure fluids, they don't have the energy they need to move into a lattice shape. It's also one of the keys to Ice II and Ice III

Yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_nucleation_theory

 

This is for gas - liquid nucleation, but liquid - solid will follow similar principles: volume reduction in free energy versus   rise in free energy at the surface, where the lattice structure is incomplete. 

Edited by exchemist
  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)

There is a question about chemistry I've had for quite some time: What exactly is the significance of enantiomers?
Even if the given compound is chiral (nonsuperimposable), wouldn't it simply depend on perspective whether the compound is levorotary or dextorotary? And for antichiral compounds, enantiomers don't seem to mean much. 
It was once described to me that the answer has to do with the given compound's ability to refract light, but I never received elaboration on how this works or how it effects stereochemistry. 
Can someone explain these things?

Edited by Anchovyforestbane
misspelling

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...