Tarantism Posted August 5, 2006 Report Posted August 5, 2006 a common thought by the masses would be that the universe is part of our reality. i believe that this is incorrect. we are, rather, part of the universes reality. conciousness is just part of one big one. Quote
DarkColoredLight Posted August 7, 2006 Report Posted August 7, 2006 Ego inside of an ego. Kind of like a baby in a womb. I like it, good thinking. Quote
Tarantism Posted August 7, 2006 Author Report Posted August 7, 2006 :) exactly! its like we co-exist pleasantly. Quote
DarkColoredLight Posted August 7, 2006 Report Posted August 7, 2006 It's symbiotic, but since we've lost this sense of self, we've also lost the sense of higher beings/consciousnesses/dimensions. I think you can still learn from the higher b/c/d even if you don't believe it exists. It's just working against nature, hopefully though that doesn't imply working for the general mass. Have you had much thoughts on for/with/against, and how it applies to just about every situation? Quote
Queso Posted August 7, 2006 Report Posted August 7, 2006 Is it just me or does this not make sense? Are you guys computers generating words? I remember I used to be one of those. Quote
Tarantism Posted August 7, 2006 Author Report Posted August 7, 2006 DCL: yes, i think about it all the time. i first discovered the higher dimensions when i took LSD for the first time. the realization really blew my mind. im not sure what you mean by for/with/against though. for some reason, i comprehend it but do not understand it. could you please elaborate? yes, i agree, certainly symbiotic, becuase without the universe we do not exist, and in a way without us the universe does not exist. one other thing i have also been thinking about is the dimension of time, and how it relates to everythings individual consciousness. could it be that things as big as galaxies have thought that simply exists on differnt planes? perhaps all actions and reactions are simply the intention of conscious thoughts that we do not understand. and im not talking about gods, but rather beings with intentions, not divine, not omnipotent, just like you and me. a tree told me things once. it left me speechless. Quote
Tarantism Posted August 7, 2006 Author Report Posted August 7, 2006 oh, i forgot to say how all that related to time. perhaps everything lives the same amount of time, an infinate moment that took place at the big bang, and the reason that we all appear to live different amounts of time is because we all feelt he dimension of time differently. Quote
DarkColoredLight Posted August 7, 2006 Report Posted August 7, 2006 oh, i forgot to say how all that related to time. perhaps everything lives the same amount of time, a innite moment that took place at the big bang, and the reason that we all appear to live different amounts of time is because we all feelt he dimension of time differently. Rather we evolved over time differently. This would support the idea of our current conscious state, those conscious states which we consider lower than ours(animal kingdom), and those conscious states which we consider higher than ours. For/with/against can describe one moment in time, which will inevitably bring you to another point in time. How you preceive(for/with/against) the initial moment will change completly the next. I hate to give an example because it ruins the fun of figuring it out on your own, for your own situation. Here's the final product of it all though:T=initial moment F=for W=with A=against X=cross section [center] T /| F W A |X X| F W A . . . . . . [/center] This can be a relationship between people/ideas/inner self(s)/nature/just about everything usually at the same time. Because you're bound to be working for someone while working with someone and inadvertanly working against someone all during one instance. If you're alone all the someone's are you, whether matierially/egoly/futurly of both. Which one is in your best interest? I guess you'd have to define your, now wouldn't you. Too many variables,DCL Quote
Tarantism Posted August 7, 2006 Author Report Posted August 7, 2006 ah, i understand. so for/with/against is just like probablilities, the possible outcomes of any given moment? here is something that i ahve been considering: infinity is HUGE. i mean, bigger than the biggest thing that we can possibly come close to comprehending. now, within a universal infinty could exist matter, and anti-matter. in this infinity could also exist one initial time seed, a moment, what we call the big bang. the so called "dawn of time". now, considering for/with/against, we can assume that after the inital push of the first moment, the progression following that had to follow the rules of for/with/against. now, lets take into account the possiblity that we are only in one reality out of seemingly infinate. perhaps, the first event spawned three realities, one for, one with, one against. and with each progressing moment, a new reality, or what i have been calling a "time seed" is began, with the alternate outcomes. that means that just one outcome can occur here, but all the other outcomes are happening in other places, in other ways, acutally, in every way possible. it balances out. "god" doesnt play dice, "he" just likes to explore every option. :) thoughts? Quote
DarkColoredLight Posted August 7, 2006 Report Posted August 7, 2006 Here's a simple example: 1 step to the right:You are standing in a room, with regular gravity; you have master walking, which has you working with gravity. You lift the right foot which has you working against the right because of air friction. Your left foot it working for your right foot by not moving, but still both feet are working with gravity. You plant your right foot, working for balence, while your muscles work with each other to balence for the whole body. etc etc I could go even more in depth but I think you get it. If we are to accept the thought that we are APART of the higherness, then we could be represented as a part of a muscle. A muscle that hasn't been working properly, but has had time to fix it's self and has been prophesized to be in perfect working condition here in just over 6 years. For/with/against to me is more of a understanding of consciousness. Am I working for with or against myself when I tell this person ____? Am I working for with or against time when I go to _____? Am I working for with or against my energy when I stay up at night and post on hypography? Quote
Tarantism Posted August 7, 2006 Author Report Posted August 7, 2006 If we are to accept the thought that we are APART of the higherness, then we could be represented as a part of a muscle. A muscle that hasn't been working properly, but has had time to fix it's self and has been prophesized to be in perfect working condition here in just over 6 years. you are talking about the period of change prophisized to follow December 2012? i am starting that push now, organizing gatherings of people with speakers, music, art, poetry, etc. i think we must take that prophesy into our own hands. "...it will be a period where god will be forgotten...". yes, it will be. thank you for your thurough explainations, :) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.