ryan2006 Posted August 25, 2006 Report Posted August 25, 2006 We all have a genetic frequency. What if we made a device that went into your ear and you could call someone by speaking their name based on genetic frequencies for individuals. This would be possible. Let me hear your thoughts. Quote
Mercedes Benzene Posted August 26, 2006 Report Posted August 26, 2006 Would you mind describing what "genetic frequency" is? Quote
ryan2006 Posted August 26, 2006 Author Report Posted August 26, 2006 Genetic frequency: the body,mind, and spirit emmits a signal based on your individual genetic make-up. I do not know exactly how to define it. Quote
Mercedes Benzene Posted August 26, 2006 Report Posted August 26, 2006 That sounds like a "strange claim" to me. I would very much like to see a source, becuase I have not been able to find anything on it. Jay-qu 1 Quote
ryan2006 Posted August 26, 2006 Author Report Posted August 26, 2006 Let's not joke around you and I both know that this is a possible invention. Conceptualized by the shoulders of people. I enjoy sharing, but if you want to call it a strange claim that is up to at least a vote by all the members. Quote
Mercedes Benzene Posted August 26, 2006 Report Posted August 26, 2006 Let's not joke around you and I both know that this is a possible invention. I certainly do not know that this is a possible invention!! How can you even claim the possibility of such technology when you cannot describe the reasoning behind its function. You can't even give an outside source to back up your claims. ;) Quote
ryan2006 Posted August 26, 2006 Author Report Posted August 26, 2006 Well sir, my answer is this, that is the problem with the patent process. We go years holding on to a concept or an idea and it is suppose to be that only the inventor can apply for the patent but where did he or she get the idea from from people like me. I had a concept for a remote light switch that used a sensor system. Like anything else you have to provide disclosures which are not full proof. My feeling is this. Money can't make you happy only peace with yourself without inaction. With this I am sharing like it should be. Patents are often first thought of as concepts and if my understanding is correct you pay people to do the process of inventing. I would only hope that if you made money off of other peoples concepts that not only would you remember who gave you the idea and also to either pay them or whatever arrangement you could make because without the concept you have nothing and giving only a little will give you nothing in return. I call for a vote. Quote
ryan2006 Posted August 26, 2006 Author Report Posted August 26, 2006 Personally, Perhaps I don't want to elaborate. It is like when you go public with something the critics are right there to smash you into the ground. Read the "He Who Dares" by Theodore Roosevelt Quote
TheBigDog Posted August 26, 2006 Report Posted August 26, 2006 OK, I'll vote ryan2006. :hyper: Your idea could only be invented by somebody other than yourself who has the capacity to actually make it happen. Is that a yes or a no? Bill Quote
InfiniteNow Posted August 26, 2006 Report Posted August 26, 2006 New ideas are wonderful things, but they will only fall out of existence if the originator of them fails to adequately convey their intent and meaning to others, or put in the necessary effort on their own to make their ideas actualize. If that didn't make sense to you, I'll restate. Your idea may have merit. It may turn into a wonderful technology. It does, however, require more information and understanding to take seriously. You were asked a question for further information and responded that you didn't have a clue, then reacted as if everyone were attacking you. It's a good idea to better understand your own position before reacting to that taken by others. Jay-qu 1 Quote
ryan2006 Posted August 27, 2006 Author Report Posted August 27, 2006 Big Dog, I consulted someone in a bar the other night. He said 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration that means 1% is the concept 99% is the actual development the people that make it work. I only offered 1% that is all I had to give but that 1% may spark the other 99%. I may react problematically to something but that does not mean that I do not try to achieve inner peace that does transcend to the peace of all. At any rate, I hope that someone adopts this 1%inspiration cause I think it would be beneficial for progress in communications. The man at the bar said he believed Einstien was quoted as saying 1%/99%. Peace, Ryan Quote
TheBigDog Posted August 27, 2006 Report Posted August 27, 2006 Ryan, you have the quote correct. 1% inspiration 99% persperation. You have an idea, but it is not to the 1% yet. I have seen things about how people have a unique electrical field that they generate. And that you could have a device on you that would read the field of anyone that you came in contact with. It would essentially keep a record of everyone you had shaken hands with. I am not sure how you would turn that into a phone, but you could certainly examine this and see what other uses it might come into. Don't stop examining the idea just because you get some flack from people. Find the threads of truth in the criticism, and use it to make the cloth stronger. Bill Jay-qu 1 Quote
ryan2006 Posted August 28, 2006 Author Report Posted August 28, 2006 Big Dog,You know you are right in probably all aspects. I just put the idea out there to see how people would respond. Edison didn't didn't necessarily invent the telephone though. I think that is right. The people he employed did. I can't employ anyone that is responible for deciphering genetic codes and frequencies but maybe in another lifetime. Ha. PEACE, Ryan Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.