sanctus Posted November 21, 2004 Author Report Posted November 21, 2004 Welcome back sundog. You actually made a good point, though ther is one consequence you speak about which is true now, but it can be changed. Augmentation of human population doesn't have to be equivalent to increasing the extintion rate of animals.It's just the way we tend to live and produce today that makes it be like that,, that's why I fight for a "durable developpement" (I'm not sure if it's the right term in english, but you get what I mean: a [for nature] sustainable way of living and producing with not much loss of comfort). Quote
Tormod Posted November 21, 2004 Report Posted November 21, 2004 I think the term you're looking for is "sustainable development". This is a very interesting thread, sanctus. Quote
sundog Posted November 22, 2004 Report Posted November 22, 2004 Originally posted by: sanctusAugmentation of human population doesn't have to be equivalent to increasing the extintion rate of animals.It's just the way we tend to live and produce today that makes it be like that I agree completely. But, considering the extinction that goes on isn't"noticeable" in our daily lives, change will not come easy. Especiallywhen the results of any change we may make are equally unnoticeable.We need incentive to change. The loss of species is enough for some,but others need something more directly rewarding. I remember as a child, you could get money for taking back your emptyglass soda bottles to the store. I think this idea stopped some timein the mid eighties (at least where I live). I guess it became cheaperto make plastic bottles which are thrown away, rather than washing andre-using the glass ones. I would like see this idea reintroduced, perhaps even be applied toeverything we can recycle. If we get a financial reward for recyclingit will surely be more popular. sundog Quote
Freethinker Posted November 22, 2004 Report Posted November 22, 2004 Originally posted by: sanctusIn your thought experiment it's only about surviving,Isn't that the point? Human survival as primary over concern for other species. Be it experimentation to rid HUMAN species of disease to assure survival or food sources. The thought experiements just allows us to understand the concept of species interaction and biases. Quote
sanctus Posted November 22, 2004 Author Report Posted November 22, 2004 No, because we have the choice how to survive; in our dayly live it's not just about surviving, it's not only the end that counts also the how (because we have the choice).In your thought experiment there is no choice that minimizes suffering, in real life there is. Quote
sanctus Posted November 22, 2004 Author Report Posted November 22, 2004 Sundog, there exists something called PET it's the re-use of old plastic bottles and in Switzerland there still exists the tax on glass bottles which you get back if you bring the bottle back. À part from that change is coming, eventually the Kyoto protocol is ratified by the neccessary % of the worlds surface, for example. Losing hope is no good, it's the last thing one has. Quote
sundog Posted November 22, 2004 Report Posted November 22, 2004 Originally posted by: sanctusSundog, there exists something called PET it's the re-use of old plastic bottles and in Switzerland there still exists the tax on glass bottles which you get back if you bring the bottle back. À part from that change is coming, eventually the Kyoto protocol is ratified by the neccessary % of the worlds surface, for example. Losing hope is no good, it's the last thing one has. Sanctus, I'm aware that efforts are being made, and some things "are" beingre-used and recycled. My point was about the difficulty of change. When we have success in our individual lives, the endorphins flowand we get that "feel good" factor. This helps us repeat the thingsthat are good for us. Just as when things go bad, you get the opposite,so we don't repeat mistakes. We all like to do the things that make usfeel good. So, making changes in our lifestyle "habitual" may be harderif there's no obvious reward. Harder still if we're giving up some benefitor luxury. My posts may seem negative but, I haven't lost hope. I know changewill come. It's just that the more each of us do now, the more can besaved. We don't have to wait for governments to impose laws to makea difference. sundog Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.