Dimension Access (single singularity) Theory

[infamous]

Old theory.

You've posted this response 5 times and I've deleted 1 already. Please give us some useful commentary instead of constantly repeating Old theory, Old theory, .......... We've got the message, give us some substance...........................Infy

[FastFuriousBK]

z

[FastFuriousBK]

z

[TheBigDog]

Old theory. Single Singularity Theory is old school.

 

Single Singularity Theory Old School:

 

In the Old School Single Singularity Theory the big bang occurred. There is a singularity deep inside each black hole in our universe. The singularity deep inside each black hole in our universe is the same singularity. The singularity of black hole A is the same as the singularity in black hole B.

 

I created the Single Singularity Theory in September of 2006.

Is that it?

Somebody please read my LAYER THEORY AAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNDDDDDD

 

mySINGLE SINGULARITY THEORY

 

AND REPLY! P L E A S E.

I would consider black holes to be independant of each other. They are just clumps of matter. If two of them get too close they can merge into one. I call them the birthplace because I see in my mind's simplistic understanding of them that atomic structures break down within a black hole. And when the hole expands out of existance the matter would reform into atomic structures as the expansion happened.

 

But it is pure speculation. If I had the capacity I could attack the problem with mathmatics, but I lack both the skill and inclination to do so. Black holes are terrific playgrouds for the curious mind. The are like God in a way, they may be easier to prove, but they are no less speculative when we claim to understand them. At least for now.

 

Bill

Have I complied with your request?

 

What have you added to the conversation? Quit yout whining.

 

Bill

[CHADS]

scientists have thought of this idea ages ago BK ... it aint new ... but its just a matter of what interperation you like most and which leading scientists band wagon you jump on .

 

I agree with you though , the single singularity theory takes my fancy also becuase it seems easier to rationalise ... hawkins and kip thorne postulated the existance or no existance of naked singularities and put up a famous wager if either was proved correct .

I theorised Naked singularities are permitted in your model at infinate distances if the universe was to crunch back .. but all data points to Continual expansion for the time being which isnt possible in the postulation.

 

Im naturally scepticle that such a model isnt stating the obvious ,that layered infinate mass occupy the same abstract region.

 

Infinity does = infinity but to be actually in the same region of space/time seems a bit infinity squared to me and a little too prohibitive.

 

If the black holes connect then this region of connection would surley be hot as hell and the universe would want to push away from it all ways..

 

interesting theory, be good to see what the mathmatics has to say on this one.

[Quantarius]

I'm currently a math student, and this subject has been on my mind for quite some time. I believe I will try and solve this riddle to see if it is workable as a model for the universe or not. If I'm correct, string theory isn't far off, we are just looking at the wrong thing. I will post my findings when I am finish with the project be patient. Welcome to the radical world or dimensional math. Don't get mad if some scientists laugh in your face when you tell them all thier theories are wrong.