oldpaddoboy Posted April 21 Report Posted April 21 Understanding that while abiogenesis is the only scientific way life could have started, we are still left with the mystery question of how that happened in detail. I have always had a soft spot for Panspermia as possibly part of that process. The following article seems to give that scenario some respectability..... https://phys.org/news/2024-04-crucial-blocks-life-earth-easily.html Crucial building blocks of life on Earth can more easily form in outer space, says new research: The origin of life on Earth is still enigmatic, but we are slowly unraveling the steps involved and the necessary ingredients. Scientists believe life arose in a primordial soup of organic chemicals and biomolecules on the early Earth, eventually leading to actual organisms. It's long been suspected that some of these ingredients may have been delivered from space. Now a new study, published in Science Advances, shows that a special group of molecules, known as peptides, can form more easily under the conditions of space than those found on Earth. That means they could have been delivered to the early Earth by meteorites or comets—and that life may be able to form elsewhere, too. The functions of life are upheld in our cells (and those of all living beings) by large, complex carbon-based (organic) molecules called proteins. How to make the large variety of proteins we need to stay alive is encoded in our DNA, which is itself a large and complex organic molecule. However, these complex molecules are assembled from a variety of small and simple molecules such as amino acids—the so-called building blocks of life. To explain the origin of life, we need to understand how and where these building blocks form and under what conditions they spontaneously assemble themselves into more complex structures. Finally we need to understand the step that enables them to become a confined, self-replicating system—a living organism. This latest study sheds light on how some of these building blocks might have formed and assembled, and how they ended up on Earth. more at link........ Moontanman 1 Quote
Vmedvil Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 On 4/21/2024 at 7:56 PM, oldpaddoboy said: Understanding that while abiogenesis is the only scientific way life could have started, we are still left with the mystery question of how that happened in detail. I have always had a soft spot for Panspermia as possibly part of that process. The following article seems to give that scenario some respectability..... https://phys.org/news/2024-04-crucial-blocks-life-earth-easily.html Crucial building blocks of life on Earth can more easily form in outer space, says new research: The origin of life on Earth is still enigmatic, but we are slowly unraveling the steps involved and the necessary ingredients. Scientists believe life arose in a primordial soup of organic chemicals and biomolecules on the early Earth, eventually leading to actual organisms. It's long been suspected that some of these ingredients may have been delivered from space. Now a new study, published in Science Advances, shows that a special group of molecules, known as peptides, can form more easily under the conditions of space than those found on Earth. That means they could have been delivered to the early Earth by meteorites or comets—and that life may be able to form elsewhere, too. The functions of life are upheld in our cells (and those of all living beings) by large, complex carbon-based (organic) molecules called proteins. How to make the large variety of proteins we need to stay alive is encoded in our DNA, which is itself a large and complex organic molecule. However, these complex molecules are assembled from a variety of small and simple molecules such as amino acids—the so-called building blocks of life. To explain the origin of life, we need to understand how and where these building blocks form and under what conditions they spontaneously assemble themselves into more complex structures. Finally we need to understand the step that enables them to become a confined, self-replicating system—a living organism. This latest study sheds light on how some of these building blocks might have formed and assembled, and how they ended up on Earth. more at link........ Interesting! Quote
Moontanman Posted April 25 Report Posted April 25 On 4/21/2024 at 7:56 PM, oldpaddoboy said: Understanding that while abiogenesis is the only scientific way life could have started, we are still left with the mystery question of how that happened in detail. I have always had a soft spot for Panspermia as possibly part of that process. The following article seems to give that scenario some respectability..... https://phys.org/news/2024-04-crucial-blocks-life-earth-easily.html Crucial building blocks of life on Earth can more easily form in outer space, says new research: The origin of life on Earth is still enigmatic, but we are slowly unraveling the steps involved and the necessary ingredients. Scientists believe life arose in a primordial soup of organic chemicals and biomolecules on the early Earth, eventually leading to actual organisms. It's long been suspected that some of these ingredients may have been delivered from space. Now a new study, published in Science Advances, shows that a special group of molecules, known as peptides, can form more easily under the conditions of space than those found on Earth. That means they could have been delivered to the early Earth by meteorites or comets—and that life may be able to form elsewhere, too. The functions of life are upheld in our cells (and those of all living beings) by large, complex carbon-based (organic) molecules called proteins. How to make the large variety of proteins we need to stay alive is encoded in our DNA, which is itself a large and complex organic molecule. However, these complex molecules are assembled from a variety of small and simple molecules such as amino acids—the so-called building blocks of life. To explain the origin of life, we need to understand how and where these building blocks form and under what conditions they spontaneously assemble themselves into more complex structures. Finally we need to understand the step that enables them to become a confined, self-replicating system—a living organism. This latest study sheds light on how some of these building blocks might have formed and assembled, and how they ended up on Earth. more at link........ This is bad news for those who advocate for life based on chemicals other than carbon, carbon once again wins the contest for being the only realistic candidate for the basis of life. Quote
Vmedvil Posted April 29 Report Posted April 29 On 4/25/2024 at 7:52 AM, Moontanman said: This is bad news for those who advocate for life based on chemicals other than carbon, carbon once again wins the contest for being the only realistic candidate for the basis of life. I am sure that some silicates and other materials can be formed in space that could be used by other biochemistries of life just as organic carbon compounds, Link = Frontiers | Formation of Interstellar Silicate Dust via Nanocluster Aggregation: Insights From Quantum Chemistry Simulations (frontiersin.org). I don't think it dooms other biochemistries of life this news. Quote
Moontanman Posted April 29 Report Posted April 29 3 hours ago, Vmedvil said: I am sure that some silicates and other materials can be formed in space that could be used by other biochemistries of life just as organic carbon compounds, Link = Frontiers | Formation of Interstellar Silicate Dust via Nanocluster Aggregation: Insights From Quantum Chemistry Simulations (frontiersin.org). I don't think it dooms other biochemistries of life this news. It might not doom other biochemistries but it does indicate the the path to life is paved with carbon. Quote
PhilG Posted June 8 Report Posted June 8 There are no "building blocks of life", no list of materials whose assembly produces a living being. Assuming life began - of course it proceeded from abiogenesis. Not aware that "science" demonstrates or what "scientific way" might be. As Moonranman offers, observation of one do not eliminate potential of the other. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.