Dandav Posted June 24 Author Report Posted June 24 (edited) Dear OceanBreeze Let me summarize the following observations: 1. The only two planets in Solar system that have no moons (Mercure & Venus) have lost most of their rotational velocity and currently can't generate global magnetic field. 2. All the other planets with moons keep quite high rotational velocity. As the planet has more moons and more massive moons, its rotation velocity is higher. 3. Mars is the only planet with moons that doesn't generate global magnetic field. However, the total mass of its two tiny moons is very low (about 10^5 smaller than our moon). 4. All the other planets with moons generate global magnetic field. 5. The rotation axis of all the planets with moons is always vertically to the orbital disc motion of their massive moons (with some minor offset) 6. The magnetic poles are always parallel to the rotation axis of the planet (with some minor offset). 7. I/O moon is the hottest moon in the solar system, while Venus is the hottest planet in the solar system. None of them has any moon of its own, and none of them has global magnetic field. Never the less, they both get significant heat energy by tidal force from nearby objects. 8. Mercure doesn't generate today any global magnetic field. However, we have found the location of the north pole of its ancient internal magnetic dipole / bar. Please, are you ready to accept those observations? If you accept the observation, do you finally agree that moons have significant impact on the planets activities by their tidal forces? Therefore, would you consider to offer me a reward my discovery? Edited June 24 by Dandav
OceanBreeze Posted June 24 Report Posted June 24 Dandav, I have never stated that a planet's moons have no significant impact on the planet by way of tidal forces. I would most definitely say that the ocean tides on Earth are a significant impact of the moon's tidal forces. That was never an issue in this thread. The main issue is your belief that a moon is required for a planet to have a magnetic field. I have shown you that is wrong, and provided a detailed explanation which you have ignored, just as you have ignored answers given to you by other posters. There is only one way to reward you for your behavior in this thread, and that is to give you this label: And this thread is now Closed. You are not banned because we generally do not ban people for posting crackpot ideas.
Recommended Posts